The truth about penis size

Your brother is a Ph.D and an MD as well? I asked because this may really be an indication of trolling if you don’t get your facts straight. That is, mere Ph.D does not yield to medical/gynecology practice.

Pretty sure it was obvious when he started citing an invisible source and then was going to xerox and present someone else’s work to us, over proven studies that are both peer reviewed with repeatable results and believable methods of data collection.

Anyone who hands down something like that and expects us to believe it on faith of his good word alone is either a prophet with the 10 Commandments in his hand or a fraud looking for attention. And I’m not terribly inspired on the first.

But thank you, 707, for pointing out exactly where the fallacy lies.

Entered thinking this was going to be 1 of those uplifting size doesn’t matter threads, leaves disappointed.

Has anyone seen Titalist? He was my PE Sensei and I’m kinda lost w/o him.

I’m really sorry to inform you that Titleist has retired. Click there for more information.

I can see why you thought that. I mean I was thinking that when I originally checked this thread but…that illusion didn’t last long.

Damn, I pm’d that guy like crazy. He was so cool and inspirational. I’ve been really low lately.

Did he leave the forum for good or just retired from pe?

PE. He may return to the forum but he’s got life to worry about and it won’t be anytime soon.

Yea, discussing with frustrated peoples is not an easy job.. Seems in vain I mentioned many times you had interpreted my statement very wrong. And I think it’s involuntary ”intentionally”. For the last time I say this: the only fact described above in that work is ” 7inch was the average size of vagina for a multipaire woman”. Point, mister Contras. The 8”, 9” problem was my solely extrapolation (which can be right or wrong) and have nothing to do with the subject or contains of that work. Another point. So, I will stop further arguing here with peoples with concrete assumptions.

Argue all you like. Your data source is still invisible and your extrapolation is patently ridiculous by any practical standard, even on a Penis Enlargement forum. Lastly, what exactly do you bring as useful information with this data source?

So far, you have given us nothing but your contention that other studies are wrong is what you have offered. Coupling this with the fact we have yet to see actual data, it seems pretty moot at best.

You can call me “Johnny Contras” all you like but I’m not the only person here who finds several things wrong with what you’re saying here.

+1

I launched this thread to a decent free will debate. You’re not forced to believe anything. Me too. And after all, we are divided into 2 categories: those with high ego medium sized dicks frustrated peoples and those with medium sized dicks worried but not frustrated ones. OK. Good enough. World is big enough to accommodate us all.
P.S. Good luck on 5,5” vagina.

This sounds like typical trolling or a marketing scheme. The “sure that is sufficient, but you wouldn’t want to put your trust in something like that” or “that may work, but I wouldn’t trust it for myself because I hold higher standards” or “good luck with that” bullshit lines are all too familiar.

Well typically a debate involves asserting an opinion then citing a source. Source being:

1. Anecdote
2. Study or chart
3. Other reputable source or expert present to be asked

And the others here have generously provided links to their charts or offered anecdotes. You have provided neither, as your study is not only not verified but not present for others to view and vet or validate.

Carry on, it’s your right. But it’s one-sided looking, not much meeting of the minds and comparing notes from my view.

PS- It’s hit or miss with shorter canals. Usually goes alright. Had one pretty bad experience but I make it work usually. Thanks.

The “make it work” comment drew me back in…

My ex had a very large vagina, and was gushy, such that we didn’t have a lot of frictional contact. Combined with my average dimensions, that made for quite the experience for us. I could just about fist her, and sex usually began with me going down, practically jamming in my whole hand (five fingers, easy), and then I’d crawl on top until she got frustrated, rolled me over and ground out another good gush. Then she’d do this twerking thing with her hips to finish me off (she was a big-booty girl, so ping Mr. Booty, he knows what move I mean). That last position hit her and me just right, and really served to tighten her up owing to the angle. I’ll admit we didn’t have a lot of other options, because we were truly mismatched. But we made it work until a whole lot of other shit stopped working, and while she wasn’t my dream pussy, and I wasn’t her dream dick, we always had a pretty good time of it. I recall telling my brother, when I first met her, Bro, I’ve never seen a girl worship dick like that.

She really went at it, sort of like this horny Pomeranian we have who’s always jumping on our Corgi’s back and grinding one out. I like the Pom way more.

Now, Wife 2.0, the upgraded version, has ~waaaay~ fewer bugs, doesn’t crash and throw shit every few days, isn’t always requiring costly reinstalls, and she’s a money clip down there. Even with average girth (5.0) I have to work it into her. So we far more options, and any position works. She’s had 3 babies, and I’ve been with her for all but the first, and there has not been significant loss of tone for her. A little, but not enough to really change things.

Either way, though, you make it work. Very few couples fit perfectly, given there is a wide variance in size for both the penis and vagina that need to match up. My wife and I are pretty lucky.

- Saul

Wait what? I’ve been summoned. (:

Oh. The ride, roll and pop the hips where the booty bounces. Yep. Love that move.