The truth about penis size

Yes. Look at the “size myth in the porn industry” thread. Mandingo may be the exception but there are no others at 9” NBPEL.

I have been with two obese women with two kids and they are tight. But that may be exceptions. If you’re reasoning is correct and the partners of obese women are average or lower than 8L and 5.5G, then, they are not going to have a satisfying sex life. We can just assume, if not infer, that those women will suck it up, or join adult sites where penis sizes are mentioned, or ask their friends about men who have the ideal penis.

Size matters if it matters to you or the woman. With obesity or loosening of the vagina being prevalent, why infer that there is a penis size problem, if it is the vagina loosening and the penis is not shrinking? In other words, why put the burden solely on the penis. Those with small penises should PE as much as those with loose vagina should do kegel exercises.

And, btw, 85% of women are satisfied with their partner’s penis size. http://dfred.bo l.ucla.edu/Leve … atisfaction.pdf If that is correct, then, maybe the obese ones are part of the remaining 15% or that there may be obese ones are part of the 85% and that they are lucky enough to find large penises.

Your math is all over the board:

5”x5” increased by 10% on both dimensions will give 5.5”x5.5”.

To convert circumference to area you use:
G^2/(4*pi)

So canceling the 4*pi we get:
Ratio = G2^2*L2/(G1^2*L1)

So

Because G=L we use G^3

5.5^3/5^3 = 1.331 or 33.1% increase

And

5.1^3/5^3 = 1.061 or 6.1% increase

Ok. This makes no sense. If vulvae were boosted with more fat, wouldn’t the labia be bigger and therefore tighter? Also, the labia will not gain fat with the woman, just the fat pad.

If you were to say that an additional fat pad would require additional length for adequate penetration, I’d be inclined to agree.

Also, to base your numbers off “real hard scientific facts”, site your sources.

I know the tricks and all of that and I’m telling you there is no way the guys I saw was just a little bigger than me. They weren’t exactly pornstars but just dudes with really big dicks that did porn. They weren’t popular.

Ok. This makes no sense. If vulvae were boosted with more fat, wouldn’t the labia be bigger and therefore tighter? Also, the labia will not gain fat with the woman, just the fat pad.

If you were to say that an additional fat pad would require additional length for adequate penetration, I’d be inclined to agree.

Also, to base your numbers off “real hard scientific facts”, site your sources.

Apparently I was inclined to think like that. But when I was study indepth the problem and being very lucky to be someway ‘near’ my brother 15 year long study I CHANGED my mind.

I have been with two obese women with two kids and they are tight. But that may be exceptions. If you’re reasoning is correct and the partners of obese women are average or lower than 8L and 5.5G, then, they are not going to have a satisfying sex life. We can just assume, if not infer, that those women will suck it up, or join adult sites where penis sizes are mentioned, or ask their friends about men who have the ideal penis.

Size matters if it matters to you or the woman. With obesity or loosening of the vagina being prevalent, why infer that there is a penis size problem, if it is the vagina loosening and the penis is not shrinking? In other words, why put the burden solely on the penis. Those with small penises should PE as much as those with loose vagina should do kegel exercises.

And, btw, 85% of women are satisfied with their partner’s penis size. http://dfred.bo l.ucla.edu/Leve … atisfaction.pdf If that is correct, then, maybe the obese ones are part of the remaining 15% or that there may be obese ones are part of the 85% and that they are lucky enough to find large penises.

Hi,

My numbers are based on real hard scientific facts. And you’re right: peoples with 9” or over are almost impossible to be found. But I wanted to mark something else. The principle to have a bigger penis. Why 8” (perfect for 90% woman’s) and 9” (perfect for 10%) ? Because it’s linked with the overweight and obesity ! And the birthing is always linked with overweight and obesity. Studies tells us over 75% of multipaire birthing woman’s have overweight/obesity problems. It’s again another nature mechanism which I don’t want to talk here for obvious reasons. So, an overweight or much more, an obese woman, will have her vulvae and vagina more ”boosted” with fat tissue and this have a negative aspect on both questions: penis size and nerves location. From my experience, all overweight/obese woman’s feel the need of a bigger penis. It’s again, very natural. And with obesity epidemic nowadays all over the world, the penis size problem is a very ”acute” one !

My scientific facts reside on my brother 15 year long study for his pH. D diplomas. I read it and now I’m sorry not to xerox it; anyway, it’s illegal to provide masters degree works without permission. Just my fifty cents.

Well.I’m going to pop a hole in this logic.

I fuck almost exclusively fat women. My last long term girl was in the 350+ lb range. And out of all of them, none can get me balls deep fully hard. Period. Additionally, the longterm girl I reference progressively fit less and less of me and tore like routinely around my girth. I could only get half in or the tip in at times.

I also keep toys on hand. A basic purple gel 6.5 or 7” which inserts around 5.5 to 6” literally bottoms out in most of them.

Yes, fat around the mound can prevent some positions and full penetration. But this is counterbalanced by literally a hundred pounds of belly fat pressing down on the vaginal canal. I’ve not been balls deep in anyone over 270lbs. And I’ve tried. And that mound is soft and gives way if you push against it (which is a neat feeling shaven )

Yes the ass and a fat girl being inflexible or hard to position is a problem and a longer penis opens up some positions but you simply cannot fit the penis you claim they need inside of a normal vaginal canal. This is whether a woman has given vaginal birth or not.

Nine inches is absolutely beyond what a vagina is designed to accept. This doesn’t mean it cannot be trained to accept it or that are no outlier females can take 9”+ but it does mean it’s pretty complicated to execute coitus and NOT OPTIMAL at that size.

However, this is my own account. I cannot speak for you but I can say your facts don’t reflect well across the board to a card carrying chubby chaser. I also am not discouraging the quest for 9”, as it’s one I’m all but a poster child for, but don’t reach out of a sense of inadequacy. Do it because you want a giant dick for yourself.

”And, btw, 85% of women are satisfied with their partner’s penis size”.
This is bullshit. Sorry for expression but things are much much more complex. First, because it’s a fact that women’s tend to hide what’s bothering them. Second, those studies where not very complex and touch only general targets (woman’s as a whole, and not for specific age, nativity, familial status, etc)..
Third, because it is this principle in use: ”it’s easier to search for tighter vaginas than to do successfully painful long-term PE’s”, or it’s counterpart: ”it’s easier to look for bigger penises than to give attention to Kegel exercises”. In this principles battle man principle always lost.

If they are scientific facts, most likely, other people would have written about it or have cited your brother’s work. Just look at the studies of average penis size: there are those of Hebernick, Hungfun, Veale—among others. Now, you may say that your brother’s findings are original just like Newton’s F=ma or Heisenberg’a Uncertainty principle. But if your brother’s work was original and monumental, like those of Newton’s, it will be common knowledge in anatomy, gynocology and urology.