Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Super hard tunica albuginea - anyone tried ultrasound, rwst or ewst

12

Super hard tunica albuginea - anyone tried ultrasound, rwst or ewst

Hey everybody;)
My tunica albuginea is very very hard and I also have a slight bend. I can feel string like scarring all the way up the penis;( So I am interested in softening the tissue! My erections are hard like stone. I have tried many things - pills, infrared and so on but nothing really worked.

Anyone used ultrasound to soften up the tunica albuginea? (Intensity of at least 1.5 W/cm2!)

What about rwst(Radial Shock Wave Therapy)?

What about laying it out on a work bench and beating it with a hammer?

Seriously, though, the goal is to coax your penis into growth, not to force it. Why not use the newbie routine?


Enter your measurements in the PE Database.

Who would have thought, that people in 2008 were right about using ultrasound for penis enlargement.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯.


Last edited by fdersby8 : 11-27-2021 at . Reason: 2009

Originally Posted by fdersby8
Who would have thought, that people in 2008 were right about using ultrasound for penis enlargement.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

Yes but nobody put science onto it until Kyrpa did. I believe many of the things that have been proposed in these forums are the holy grail of PE, but ot has to be brought down to research, science and organized.


Period 1: 06/08/2020 BPFSL: 22cm (8.66") BPEL: 22cm (8.66") EG: 15.8cm (6.25") => 09/07/2020 BPFSL: 23.9cm (9.40")

Period 2: 05/01/2021 BPFSL: 24cm (9.44") BPEL: 22cm (8.66") EG: 15.8cm (6.25") => 07/24/2021 BPFSL: 25.4cm (10.00") BPEL: 23.5cm (9.25")

Goal: 1 Foot x 7.5 Inches (30.48cm x 19.05cm) NBPEL

Also, the problem turned out to be the septum rather than the tunica. Tunica is hard of course, but it is not a dead end. The Septum is, or better say now thanks to Kyrpa an others, was the dead end.

I never get tired of mentioning my experience, I hit a dead end in 2008-9. Tried multiple things, and quickly through self examination I discovered that the septum was the limiting factor. For years, I kept digging into forums and asking the so called “gurus” about the septum, nobody had any idea, and also discovered how much bullshit and lies are in the PE community. Many of these “mentors” were telling me “oh yeah this guy grew his septum with this and that routine” but never could point out specifically measurements, protocols, start size, ending size, progress nothing. It was all just adding more weight hanging or pulling with tremendous forces which never made sense to me. Trying to sell “PE coach”. Yeah coach my ass.

10 years later, around 2018-2019, found the log of Kyrpa and others experimenting with US. Carefully followed them for almost 2 years, reading everything, until finally I replicated Kyrpa’s successful routine last year. It worked. And the septum is not a problem anymore.


Period 1: 06/08/2020 BPFSL: 22cm (8.66") BPEL: 22cm (8.66") EG: 15.8cm (6.25") => 09/07/2020 BPFSL: 23.9cm (9.40")

Period 2: 05/01/2021 BPFSL: 24cm (9.44") BPEL: 22cm (8.66") EG: 15.8cm (6.25") => 07/24/2021 BPFSL: 25.4cm (10.00") BPEL: 23.5cm (9.25")

Goal: 1 Foot x 7.5 Inches (30.48cm x 19.05cm) NBPEL

Originally Posted by igigi
Also, the problem turned out to be the septum rather than the tunica. Tunica is hard of course, but it is not a dead end. The Septum is, or better say now thanks to Kyrpa an others, was the dead end.

I never get tired of mentioning my experience, I hit a dead end in 2008-9. Tried multiple things, and quickly through self examination I discovered that the septum was the limiting factor. For years, I kept digging into forums and asking the so called “gurus” about the septum, nobody had any idea, and also discovered how much bullshit and lies are in the PE community. Many of these “mentors” were telling me “oh yeah this guy grew his septum with this and that routine” but never could point out specifically measurements, protocols, start size, ending size, progress nothing. It was all just adding more weight hanging or pulling with tremendous forces which never made sense to me. Trying to sell “PE coach”. Yeah coach my ass.

10 years later, around 2018-2019, found the log of Kyrpa and others experimenting with US. Carefully followed them for almost 2 years, reading everything, until finally I replicated Kyrpa’s successful routine last year. It worked. And the septum is not a problem anymore.

Igigi, are you using 1Mhz or 3Mhz?


Start date: 10/06/2021, NBPEL: 6in, MEG: 5in

UPDATE: 12/14/2022, NPBEL: 7.25in, MEG:5.25

Originally Posted by fdersby8
Who would have thought, that people in 2008 were right about using ultrasound for penis enlargement.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

I am sure there are even earlier mentions.

At that time the equipment was not easily available.

And I hate to say this but the discussion was usually frozen down by the ingnorance as well.

You can find showstoppers like it wont work, use the IR instead.
From the people who though they were the highest authors of PE knowledge.


START 18/13.15 cm Jul 24th 18 (7.09/5.18") NOW 22.5/15.2 cm Fer 12th 20 (8.86/5.98") GOAL 8.5"/ 6"

When connective tissue is stretched within therapeutic temperatures ranging 102 to 110 F (38.9- 43.3 C), the amount of structural weakening produced by a given amount of tissue elongation varies inversely with the temperature. This is apparently related to the progressive increase in the viscous flow properties of the collagenous tissue when it is heated. (Warren et al (1971,1976)

Originally Posted by igigi

Yes but nobody put science onto it until Kyrpa did.

Absolutely! I suspect that the scope of this work is equivalent to a PhD thesis. Kyrpä, bring your knowledge to paper and you are Dr. Kyrpä.

Originally Posted by Rocco25
Absolutely! I suspect that the scope of this work is equivalent to a PhD thesis. Kyrpä, bring your knowledge to paper and you are Dr. Kyrpä.

Surely they would be laughing their way out as the research does not meet the academic requirements. No matter the content.

That said it is stupendously amazing what kind of absolute nonsense publications can pass peer to peer reviews sometimes.
Just because the requirements are met, again no matter the content.


START 18/13.15 cm Jul 24th 18 (7.09/5.18") NOW 22.5/15.2 cm Fer 12th 20 (8.86/5.98") GOAL 8.5"/ 6"

When connective tissue is stretched within therapeutic temperatures ranging 102 to 110 F (38.9- 43.3 C), the amount of structural weakening produced by a given amount of tissue elongation varies inversely with the temperature. This is apparently related to the progressive increase in the viscous flow properties of the collagenous tissue when it is heated. (Warren et al (1971,1976)

Originally Posted by Kyrpa

Surely they would be laughing their way out as the research does not meet the academic requirements. No matter the content.

If you were to put this down properly on paper - with all source references - then I don’t think it would fail to meet academic standards.

I really have a lot of respect for your work!

Originally Posted by Rocco25
If you were to put this down properly on paper - with all source references - then I don’t think it would fail to meet academic standards.
I really have a lot of respect for your work!

Maybe it would get published in an established peer-to-peer review platform if conducted properly. That would be it.
It would take time to pull through, as there need to be enough samples collected with standard procedure to show anything.
The results of one or two man’s units are not enough to convince anyone in those circles.


START 18/13.15 cm Jul 24th 18 (7.09/5.18") NOW 22.5/15.2 cm Fer 12th 20 (8.86/5.98") GOAL 8.5"/ 6"

When connective tissue is stretched within therapeutic temperatures ranging 102 to 110 F (38.9- 43.3 C), the amount of structural weakening produced by a given amount of tissue elongation varies inversely with the temperature. This is apparently related to the progressive increase in the viscous flow properties of the collagenous tissue when it is heated. (Warren et al (1971,1976)

There is for sure still a lot of work to be done before a doctoral thesis is ready. Of course, my sentence was a bit exaggerated.

But that is not my point. I am of the opinion that the scope, quantity and content of your work is close to a doctoral thesis. You have read and evaluated many sources, in the end you can base most of your statements on these sources and your conclusions. And for that we all can say thank you so much! Many are now reaping the fruits of your work.

Originally Posted by Rocco25
There is for sure still a lot of work to be done before a doctoral thesis is ready. Of course, my sentence was a bit exaggerated.

But that is not my point. I am of the opinion that the scope, quantity and content of your work is close to a doctoral thesis. You have read and evaluated many sources, in the end you can base most of your statements on these sources and your conclusions. And for that we all can say thank you so much! Many are now reaping the fruits of your work.

Thank you, hopefully as many as possible keep on logging their results. Everything is valuable for further development.
Even with non-standardized procedures.

Surely the doctoral thesis thing is out of reach, I didn´t take it that seriously.
But to publish something at some point remains in the realms of possibility.


START 18/13.15 cm Jul 24th 18 (7.09/5.18") NOW 22.5/15.2 cm Fer 12th 20 (8.86/5.98") GOAL 8.5"/ 6"

When connective tissue is stretched within therapeutic temperatures ranging 102 to 110 F (38.9- 43.3 C), the amount of structural weakening produced by a given amount of tissue elongation varies inversely with the temperature. This is apparently related to the progressive increase in the viscous flow properties of the collagenous tissue when it is heated. (Warren et al (1971,1976)

Originally Posted by Kyrpa

But to publish something at some point remains in the realms of possibility.

Whenever you would go to do something like that, I can only remind you of my offer: If I can help you in any way with the evaluation, let me know.

What would you take to PhD or publication?

Top
12
Similar Threads 
ThreadStarterForumRepliesLast Post
Putting A Finger On The Science Of PEJm123Penis Enlargement2311-29-2008 08:51 PM
For the pumpers who've had permanent results - how hard is your dick?Metal EdPenis Pumps1607-13-2006 03:23 AM
how hard in poundage?GottagrowPenis Enlargement109-26-2003 01:00 AM
PE and the Changing TunicawadzillaPenis Enlargement1007-22-2003 04:48 PM

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:01 PM.