Somatotype and PE

Many bodybuilders and other athletes tailor their workout routine to fit their somatotype. I believe knowing yours and understanding the benefits and limitations inherent with it will allow you to better develope your PE routine. First let me briefly describe each so you can figure out your type.

Ectomorphic: characterized by long and thin muscles/limbs and low fat storage; usually referred to as slim. Ectomorphs are not predisposed to store fat or build muscle.
Mesomorphic: characterized by medium bones, solid torso, low fat levels, wide shoulders with a narrow waist; usually referred to as muscular. Mesomorphs are predisposed to build muscle but not store fat.
Endomorphic: characterized by increased fat storage, a wide waist and a large bone structure, usually referred to as fat. Endomorphs are predisposed to storing fat.

Now no one is a pure ectomorph, mesomorph, or endomorph; Rather you are designated a number 1-7 in each. Everyone has one type they tend to fit better than the others but some people find they may be a combination of two. Endo/mesomorph, or ecto/mesomorph.(never ecto/endomorph)

In the fitness world this would generally translate to your reps and the amount of cardio. Higher reps for endomorphs (12-15) and performing more cardio. And lower reps for ectomorphs (8 or lower) and less cardio. Mesomorphs are in the middle.

I may be wrong, but I would not be suprised if this translated to our goals of PE. I believe endomorphs would probably gain more with more reps of kegels and jelqs where ectomorphs would probably fall into the “less is more” catagory.

If anyone else has any input on this idea, please comment.

I think the idea is good, (that people should tailor their PE goals based on their own individual body type), but I’m not sure if it is a one-to-one comparison. Skin elasticity plays a role, for example. And that is never defined in the three somatypes.

I don’t know if you’re on to something or not but I am an ectomorph and definitely a “less is more” kind of guy. Never put the two together though.

Though popular and often discussed in context of bodybuilding, constitutional psychology is pseudo scientific nonsense.

No, somatotype is not correleted to penis dimension, or penis enlarmgent training.

But penistype maybe. Still there is no study about penis types.

So, what you be the right somatotype to me in terms of PE, I wonder?

This is exactly what I hate about science. There is never enough research on the human penile world. Everywhere you read scientifically approved articles about penis enhancement, you will always read “penis enlargement are not scientifically proved”, or “Not enough research on it, so it must be impossible, then” “There are not enough scientific studies to prove PE actually works”. Why the hell haven’t science delved deep inside this amazing thing which is penis enlargement, just exactly as they did back in the 70’s with bodybuilding?? You see, there are thousands of scientific and even governamental support towards health maintenance, exercises, gym, working out, bodybuilding in general, but NOTHING in PE!! And then I think to myself, these people are really a bunch of assholes.

And then, here we are. Average people creating communities to help ourselves in whatever way we can with self experience, tips and building the knowledge and studies about penises ourselves, with our own units as subjects. No penile specific supplements, lots of garbage like ‘enlarge penis 4 inches in 3 weeks’, and lots of small men around the world desperate to find a community like thundersplace, so willing to build up this knowledge and help the others.