Actually I was aware of those correlations. I also believe that penis size can be correlated to body height, size of fingers, feet, limbs, etc. The main reason may be proportionality. Average length of index fingers of 10 six-foot tall men should be higher than corresponding value for 10 five-foot-tall men. So, why not same to the penis size? I was a bit doubtful that penis size should be related to size of any facial part. By “everything” I meant those parts I mentioned explicitly. Size and shape of facial parts are more dependent on regions than on height, which is already seen correlated to penis size.
Of course, given basic proportionality, it would not be surprising if everything on a six foot tall man was proportionately larger than everything on a five foot tall man, but that’s kind of off the point of the thread.
The point of the thread is, take those 10 six foot tall men. Some have big noses. Some have average noses. Some have small noses. Is it more likely that those with a big nose have a big penis?
Or, a more interesting question: there are two guys. One is shorter and has a big nose. One is taller and has a small nose. On the basis of that, which one would you expect to have the larger penis?
If you haven’t looked at it already, I suggest that you do some exploration of The Dive and WestLA’s continuing series Which One Has the Bigger Dick? Which one has the bigger dick? Part 23 is the latest installment.