Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

# Myths and false ideas in PE

6. Is that real? Women discussing their big dick experience!

It’s not directly related to PE, but often appearing in different threads on the Forum: a group of women discussing their big dick experience (8, 9, 10”). If we are talking about a team of porn actresses chatting, I have no further comments. But if it happens to be average girls, then it’s a big bulshi*!
I’ll prove that with a little math. Let’s agree on the following terms:

1. A “big dick” is 7.5”+. I don’t have to go only for huge dicks to prove my point.
2. The frequency of dicks of 7.5” and larger is around 3%. This value may not be very accurate, but it does not matter much if it’s 5%, or 2%. Let’s stick to 3%.
3. The average number of sex partners for a woman along her lifetime is 8.6 (USA statistics). Let’s round it up to 9.

Now let’s compute the odds for an average woman to meet a single “big dick” (7.5”+) among the 9 partners in her life. From the point of view of probabilities, each guy is an independent event (except the case of her fucking 9 twin brothers). The average woman has 9 trials. We have to apply the formula for the binomial distribution probability:

Odds = C(N, M) * p^M * (1 — p)^(N-M)

Where
P = the probability of an individual event (in our case the 3%)
M = the number of favorable cases (we set for 1 single case of big dick)
N = the number of trials (that is 9)
C(…) = combinations (you should have learnt about it ;) )

I’ve done the simple computation and got a probability of P1 = 21% that an average woman meets exactly one big dick in her lifetime.
I also did the calculus to see the odds for that woman to encounter two big dicks in her life. I got P2 = 2.6%. The odds to meet three big dicks is P3 = 0.5%. Odds for encountering more big dicks are so small that don’t count at all.
We can conclude that our average woman has a total probability of around P = 24% to feel at least one big dick in her life (summing up P1 + P2 + … + P9).

Now let’s see which is the probability for two random women to both have ever encountered big dicks?
It’s simply the product of P*P = 5.8%. Not very likely to happen! For a group of three women to have experienced big dicks the odds fall at 1.3%.

I think it’s enough to see that most women never reach to experience a big dick and it’s very unlikely to have a random group of women with real experience of big dicks.
Notice that I lowered the limit for big dicks at 7.5”. If it was 8”+, the odds would have fallen 10 times!

Starting BPEL: 6.9" (Dec.1st, 2008)

Current BPEL: 8.11" NBPEL: 7.63" BPFSL: 9.09"

Current MEG : 5.6"

Last edited by cervixhunter : 07-03-2009 at .

Do remember that as when regarding the women on forums etc., on let’s say a big dick thread, there is a selection being made as mostly girls who have been fortunate(or not) enough to come across a big dick will be looking at the thread.

I emphasized I consider random women as appear in most threads on this Forum: “My girlfriends told me…” etc. It’s not worth to consider that kind of information to be true, most likely mundane lies.

Starting BPEL: 6.9" (Dec.1st, 2008)

Current BPEL: 8.11" NBPEL: 7.63" BPFSL: 9.09"

Current MEG : 5.6"

Originally Posted by cervixhunter
5. Some people are “more is less”, others are “more is more” type

This classification is based on what people reported as working for them. I think this should not be seen as a characteristic of a person, but of its workout. Changing the workout, one may switch from “more is more” to “more is less”.

We all admit that a good PE workout puts some stress on the dick and some kind of damage is done. This requires time for healing. The more intense the workout is, the more time is needed for healing.
In this view, someone said to be a “more is less” type, actually does an intense workout. He sees gains only if it allows enough time for recovery.
The “more is more” type uses to have a lighter workout, needing less frequent rest. If there is no need for rest, more workout has to yield more gains – elementary logic.

I think the basic issue is that we don’t have an objective comparison of the intensity of PE exercises. We only count the frequency (number of repetitions), but the most important fact, the intensity is left to one’s subjective estimation. This leads to major differences in how different people do their workouts. I can imagine that one who uses to make a jelq with a narrow grip and high erection may stress his dick ten times more than someone else doing a light jelq.

How should we define intensity in a more objective manner? Tough nut, as intensity should be always tailored to the characteristics of a person. Stating that a correct stretching should be done with a force of 2kgf, or a clamp should build up a pressure of 100 milibars would be appropriate for some and may not be for others. We should think about units that are specific to each body, still applicable to everybody. I mean something related to “invariants” in science. An example outside PE: how big should be one’s head? 9” – wrong answer! It should be 1/8 of the body height.

Interesting theory.

Have you read the Etp theory? ;)

"You shall call him E.Honda"

"Demokrati är inget annat än att ge majoriteten rätten att mobba minoriteten. Min kropp, mitt kapital och mitt liv ska vara mitt val!"

Originally Posted by cervixhunter
I emphasized I consider random women as appear in most threads on this Forum: “My girlfriends told me…” etc. It’s not worth to consider that kind of information to be true, most likely mundane lies.

Yep I completely agree. After reading a good few Invisible threads, I have come to the conclusion that my size is most certainly huge (7.3”NBPEL x 5.5” MSEG) and will most likely be the biggest any girl I am with has ever had, at this age(I’m 18).

I’ll also add that I have a few “Online Girlfriends”, some from Ireland, one from Argentina and another from Peru(living in the USA). After seeing me on cam, they all think I have a 9-10 inch penis :D , and do note that I am 6ft3” tall and have huge hands :) . Of course I didn’t sorrect them ;) .

p.s. the Peruvian gril is incredible, I would rate her a 10, and she wants to come over to Ireland to meet me :D .

Originally Posted by man-of-10
I’ll also add that I have a few “Online Girlfriends”, some from Ireland, one from Argentina and another from Peru(living in the USA). After seeing me on cam, they all think I have a 9-10 inch penis :D , and do note that I am 6ft3” tall and have huge hands :) . Of course I didn’t sorrect them ;) .

p.s. the Peruvian gril is incredible, I would rate her a 10, and she wants to come over to Ireland to meet me :D .

Go for it bro :D

"You shall call him E.Honda"

"Demokrati är inget annat än att ge majoriteten rätten att mobba minoriteten. Min kropp, mitt kapital och mitt liv ska vara mitt val!"

Enlightening survey, I never would have thought the average woman only has slept with 9 men. I guess that goes to show what I know about women.

Originally Posted by man-of-10
Yep I completely agree. After reading a good few Invisible threads, I have come to the conclusion that my size is most certainly huge (7.3”NBPEL x 5.5” MSEG) and will most likely be the biggest any girl I am with has ever had, at this age(I’m 18).

Christ I hope so iv just went up to 5.5 EG but I’m not recording it until I’m sure, Most girls iv been with thought I was huge which is great but I always wanted to be bigger!

Maybe there’s a condition for us guys like bodybuilders have bigorexia?

Originally Posted by man-of-10
I’ll also add that I have a few “Online Girlfriends”, some from Ireland, one from Argentina and another from Peru(living in the USA). After seeing me on cam, they all think I have a 9-10 inch penis :D , and do note that I am 6ft3” tall and have huge hands :) . Of course I didn’t sorrect them ;) .

P.s. The Peruvian gril is incredible, I would rate her a 10, and she wants to come over to Ireland to meet me :D .

Christ if I was you id pay for her ticket :) Get her over now!

You need your Spell Checker looked at kimc?

This place runs on donations, help out if you can. Thanks.

Originally Posted by cervixhunter
6. Is that real? Women discussing their big dick experience!

It’s not directly related to PE, but often appearing in different threads on the Forum: a group of women discussing their big dick experience (8, 9, 10”). If we are talking about a team of porn actresses chatting, I have no further comments. But if it happens to be average girls, then it’s a big bulshi*!
I’ll prove that with a little math. Let’s agree on the following terms:

1. A “big dick” is 7.5”+. I don’t have to go only for huge dicks to prove my point.
2. The frequency of dicks of 7.5” and larger is around 3%. This value may not be very accurate, but it does not matter much if it’s 5%, or 2%. Let’s stick to 3%.
3. The average number of sex partners for a woman along her lifetime is 8.6 (USA statistics). Let’s round it up to 9.

Now let’s compute the odds for an average woman to meet a single “big dick” (7.5”+) among the 9 partners in her life. From the point of view of probabilities, each guy is an independent event (except the case of her fucking 9 twin brothers). The average woman has 9 trials. We have to apply the formula for the binomial distribution probability:

Odds = C(N, M) * p^M * (1 — p)^(N-M)

Where
P = the probability of an individual event (in our case the 3%)
M = the number of favorable cases (we set for 1 single case of big dick)
N = the number of trials (that is 9)
C(…) = combinations (you should have learnt about it ;) )

I’ve done the simple computation and got a probability of P1 = 21% that an average woman meets exactly one big dick in her lifetime.
I also did the calculus to see the odds for that woman to encounter two big dicks in her life. I got P2 = 2.6%. The odds to meet three big dicks is P3 = 0.5%. Odds for encountering more big dicks are so small that don’t count at all.
We can conclude that our average woman has a total probability of around P = 24% to feel at least one big dick in her life (summing up P1 + P2 + … + P9).

Now let’s see which is the probability for two random women to both have ever encountered big dicks?
It’s simply the product of P*P = 5.8%. Not very likely to happen! For a group of three women to have experienced big dicks the odds fall at 1.3%.

I think it’s enough to see that most women never reach to experience a big dick and it’s very unlikely to have a random group of women with real experience of big dicks.
Notice that I lowered the limit for big dicks at 7.5”. If it was 8”+, the odds would have fallen 10 times!

Finally someone who gets stats! I’m no expert myself, and I hate it with a passion, but I’ve been forced to learn a bit here or there.

A pointer: you don’t need calc or addition of the various Pm (I.e. P1+P2.) results to get the “at least one” result. Simply run the analysis for likelihood that a woman will not encounter ANY penis of the chosen size — in other words M = 0. Then subtract that from 1 (or 100%), because if a woman has an X% chance of never encountering an X inch penis in her lifetime, she has an (100-X)% chance of encountering one or more such penises. For our purposes, the specific success rate Bernoulli equation isn’t really that necessary, since we don’t care so much for the likelihood of a woman encountering exactly 2 X inch penises in her life, but not 1 or 3.

So the formula becomes: 1- ((1 — p)^N)
P = incidence of particular size or larger (I.e. 0.8% penises equal to or longer than 8” per Mr. Average site)
N = number of partners (or number or men in any group, really.you can put in 22 to get the likelihood of a particular size or larger appearing on a football field at any particular time, for instance.refs don’t count).

I just noticed how old this thread is. Oh well.

And, by the way, 5.8% (the chances that two women share a ‘huge’ penis memory) is quite a lot, rather than “Not very likely to happen”.

It means that, for every 20 pairs of female friends meeting up to chitchat, one pair has something to talk about.
I think everyone of us can meet/come to know dozens of these ‘pairs’; sooner or later we all find out that one pair which talks about sizes.

Apart from that, I’d say it’s far more common for a group of women to discuss and have fun about the big penis experience of only one of them - not necessarily that all have to share that knowledge.

Originally Posted by ModestoMan

…there’s no coiled-up inner penis waiting to be straightened out.

Well, perhaps you don’t have a coiled up inner penis. I have nearly 2 feet of perfectly formed penis coiled up like a tape measure and just waiting for me to pull it out.

Originally Posted by cervixhunter
5. Some people are “more is less”, others are “more is more” type

This classification is based on what people reported as working for them. I think this should not be seen as a characteristic of a person, but of its workout. Changing the workout, one may switch from “more is more” to “more is less”.

We all admit that a good PE workout puts some stress on the dick and some kind of damage is done. This requires time for healing. The more intense the workout is, the more time is needed for healing.
In this view, someone said to be a “more is less” type, actually does an intense workout. He sees gains only if it allows enough time for recovery.
The “more is more” type uses to have a lighter workout, needing less frequent rest. If there is no need for rest, more workout has to yield more gains – elementary logic.

I think the basic issue is that we don’t have an objective comparison of the intensity of PE exercises. We only count the frequency (number of repetitions), but the most important fact, the intensity is left to one’s subjective estimation. This leads to major differences in how different people do their workouts. I can imagine that one who uses to make a jelq with a narrow grip and high erection may stress his dick ten times more than someone else doing a light jelq.

How should we define intensity in a more objective manner? Tough nut, as intensity should be always tailored to the characteristics of a person. Stating that a correct stretching should be done with a force of 2kgf, or a clamp should build up a pressure of 100 milibars would be appropriate for some and may not be for others. We should think about units that are specific to each body, still applicable to everybody. I mean something related to “invariants” in science. An example outside PE: how big should be one’s head? 9” – wrong answer! It should be 1/8 of the body height.

First of all, what an interest thread this this! Thanks for bringing it up Cervixhunter.

I agree with you that with manual exercises (be it jelqing or stretching), it is impossible to have an objective description of intensity. Everyone feels and reacts to pressure differently. The reason I mentioned this is that I am one of those who pulled too hard in my newbie routine to incur injuries. I was told by my dentist that I have a rather high pain tolerance level. So not realizing the intensity was too high for my manual pulling and jelqing, I thought I was doing a great job for 4 months straight. The end result is that I had to take some break with minimal gains.

Then I started to look into hanging. Now, hanging is one of the ways to have a consistent “intensity” due to the amount of weights applied. The challenge is that a person who hangs 5lbs will may respond differently to the other person who also hangs 5lbs. Our body reacts differently to different pressure (this goes the same with weight training on other muscles). So I started with 3lbs. The interesting thing is that the pressure I feel from hanging 3lbs is less than what I was pulling my penis with my hand! This experienced shocked me a bit as I thought hanging 3lbs would produce more stretch than my hand pulling.

I believe the biggest challenge in a person’s PE career is knowing what “intensity” is needed to produce the most results with the less unproductive stress to the penile structure.

I am finally recovering from my hanging.

Notorious "Hardgainer". No Gain in 4 Years! Check out my "Blog" under Profile.

(starting: Jun 2007) 5.75" BPEL x 5" EG / (Sept 11, 2011) 6.375" BPEL x 5.125" EG / (July 1st, 2014) 6.25" BPEL x 5.125" EG (lost a bit of size)

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:04 AM.