Mixed Reviews on PE

But BeaverCreek wrote:

So, how could you be too conclusive? If you are all that ‘conclusive’, why would that be subject to suspicion?

Hi Dave,

Welcome.

PE is nothing more than the manipulation of soft tissue. Soft tissue that has grown to its current size. There is a medical condition called Priapism that results in a permeability enlarged erect penis in some cases.

It is not like we are trying to split atoms here. Oh wait, that is possible too. :p

Yes, PE is possible and it is real. Results do vary, though. If you are going to do this, start out slow and make it fun. A good simple jelq routine can be very meditative. I few stretching pulls at the urinal take practically no time at all.

Have fun!

Because it brings to mind, and means much the same as the expression “Sounds too good to be true”

Or: Over advertising.

Even: Flogging a horse to death

I’m sure there are many more

For sure…

pudendum?

pudendum is one of them.

We have a lot of smart guys here. That’s why this place is so amazing.

I almost feel nervous posting this as I don’t want to invoke a collective wrath but, with reference to P-G’s comment “Photographic evidence is pretty sparse and low quality, but see here: Before-and-After Measurement Pictures”, I have often dwelt on this very issue.

Certainly there are some overwhelmingly obvious reasons why such photos would be uncommon but given the number of members here it really does surprise me that there are not more photos showing the before and after effects of PE. Please understand me - I am a believer and I can personally attest to a very small gain after one year of PE but I do sometimes wonder about such things as measurement error and wishful thinking perhaps being behind the innocent over-estimation of some gains.

Please don’t beat up on me. Again, I re-iterate, I am a believer - it just really does surprise me that there are not more of these photos. Then again, when I put myself in those shoes, there’s another really good reason why this might occur. I, for one, didn’t take before photos so it would be a little hard to contribute myself to the before/after collection. And I imagine most are like me. Hm, I’ve perhaps answered my own little query here whilst writing about it :)

Search for Yguy’s threads.. This guy went from a 4.5” penis to a 8” penis through PE.

Yes, it works.. Would you think a place like Thunder’s Place would have existed for so long with so many happy members if it didn’t work?

willy8, many of us agree it’s a mystery why there isn’t better photographic evidence (and more of it) on a forum this large. I think that truly large gains (e.g., 2” of length) that would show up undeniably in a photo are very rare, and just as important, very few guys take good starting photos including rulers.

There would be great deal of visual evidence if a small subset of members posted their present size. It could be put in an area like the silly testimonials that accompany the pill purveyors, however, the membership of large rods is a modest group and the exhibitionism of the moment is not something they cherish. Also, there will always be the doubters and even if it were shown a group that would be far above the statistical norm in penis size, it would still be looked at with suspicion. And some of us are so big it’s embarrassing.

This is an important point.

Logically, it’s just unrealistic that a place like this would exist with so many members if it didn’t work. There is always room for reasonable doubt, but at a certain point you just have to use common sense.

The Flat Earth forum has 14344 members. :)

:rolling:

Yep, I have gained enough that I have no doubts as to the reality of PE. But as far as pictures go? Nope.

I never took photos and never even thought about it. My goal was to extend beyond my belly button and I always use it to gauge my gains.

“too conclusive and subject to suspicion” were the words you used earllier, BeaverCreek. Why would anyone want to subject themselves to the suspicion of having been found to be too conclusive?