Measurement study

Well they probably do because they have NO IDEA how big a cock is when they look at it. There’s a thread around here somewhere talking about it. On the other hand, it seems the 8x6 cock is the holy grail around here so maybe they’re right..

But, you still have to know what to do with it. A cock of pretty much any size is only for appearance and psychological sake where true sexual prowess involves a hell of a lot more than that. My dad impressed me with this knowledge during our first “talk” and handed me a bunch of books on the topic. From then on it was my life’s mission to be incredible in bed.

As for measurement studies, I think they will ALWAYS run a little big. I mean I’d imagine most guys who think their cock is small would NEVER participate in one which would always skew the data towards a larger than actual average. The real average is probably a lot lower than most studies could account for.

Average dick is between 5” and 6.5”(not bone pressed).

That’s like saying the average man is between 5’0” and 6’6”. It’s quite a range.

I have never seen any data say that 6.5” was avererage. 5”-7” is 90% of all men, yes, but 6.5” is past average.

There was a recent thread on this topic, but I can’t find it right now. The person who started the thread had links to 8 or 10 different scientific studies. Some of the studies measured bone-pressed, others didn’t. However, not a single study showed an erect length greater than 5.88 inches. One study showed an average NBPEL of 5.88 inches, but the rest of the studies were less than that.

Well… here it is. I found the thread. I consider this the definitive thread on average penis size.

Penis Size: The True Average

Various reports make it clear that 8” length is enough to “bottom out” in quite a few women, causing discomfort or pain from that and other factors such as hitting the cervix, and limiting sexual positions. 6” is also be a bit more girth than many women can take easily or comfortably, and more than some can take at all.

I’m not sure 8x6 is a “holy grail” as much as an urban legend…..

FF

Hello guys been lurking for a while here and I have a question. The study that IMO is one of the more reliable the Cancun study (http://www.mrav … com/results.htm is a good site review of it including the important note that the median is smaller then the average due to the big guys skewing results) , states that several of the measurements on both sides of the bell curves were in the <1% range- for example "0.1%" were between 8.5-8.75 as well as 8.75-9. But .1% of 300 men is only 1/3rd of a man. So whats up? Was one man each in both of these size categories and they rounded down or something? Because thats a hell of a rounding down when you think about it. I might be really confused here but if someone can help me out here this would shed some light on the true prevalence of both the really small and really big guys.