Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Longest length to pound it

1234

Just to share my experience. Over the years I went from 6x5 to 7.8/6.2. I have been married 15 years no kids. She really responded well to increased size. She wants sex more often and seems to really enjoy it. But 3 weeks ago she told me that she gets really sore after sex. Told me to get some lube, which I did. We tried with lube and so far she is OK. So I think I will continue to reach my goal of 8x6.5. In the beginning of sessions she only takes it part of the way, but at the end she takes it all with out bottoming out.

Can’t find the site now but I think the information is available somewhere. There was a Gynecologist stating that most of the nerve endings in the vagina are in the first few inches. She went on to say that some surgeries that take place deep in the vagina do not require anesthesia due to the lack of nerves there. But to counter that I think it is the same thing that big tits do for us (some of us). We get excited with there size. I think for a female playing with a dig dick is exciting and in turn increases arousal.

Found it:
“First, the vagina is a very elastic environment through which a baby can pass, yet it’s one that easily retains a tampon. In other words, it snugly accommodates the entity it surrounds.

Second, men and women give the vagina way more credit for sensitivity than is reasonable. The most sensitive part of the vagina is the part that is closest to the outside of a woman’s body. Four inches will cover that.

Minor surgery without anesthetic can be conducted on the inner part of a woman’s vagina without discomfort. That’s a big clue about just how much sensation women have deep inside where large penises are supposed to reach.

Third, about three-quarters of women don’t reach orgasm by intercourse unless they have simultaneous clitoral stimulation — no matter what the size of the inserting body part. “

Here is the link to the complete article from WebMD: http://www.webmd.com/content/Articl…tm?pagenumber=1

Originally Posted by pauladventurese
Just to share my experience. Over the years I went from 6x5 to 7.8/6.2. I have been married 15 years no kids. She really responded well to increased size.


Thanks for sharing your experience, and glad to hear PE results are working out for you.

I have also seen quite a few experiences from men in long-term relationships whose partners have never been able to comfortably accomodate their size, probably because the woman has a small vagina to begin with. And for men in new or short-term relationships, a larger size is more likely to be a problem at first. So I don’t think your experience can be generalized.

As a naturally pretty girthy guy, I’ve had some problems with partners getting sore, and have even noticed that when I’ve gone a week or more without having sex with a particular partner, she feels extra tight and I have to take pay extra attention and take it easy at first.

FF

Originally Posted by FrenumFellow
Thanks for sharing your experience, and glad to hear PE results are working out for you.

I have also seen quite a few experiences from men in long-term relationships whose partners have never been able to comfortably accomodate their size, probably because the woman has a small vagina to begin with. And for men in new or short-term relationships, a larger size is more likely to be a problem at first. So I don’t think your experience can be generalized.

As a naturally pretty girthy guy, I’ve had some problems with partners getting sore, and have even noticed that when I’ve gone a week or more without having sex with a particular partner, she feels extra tight and I have to take pay extra attention and take it easy at first.

FF

And how many have not stated a problem, or that adjustment occurred well? We really don’t have any charts to go by. So ‘quite a few’ doesn’t statistically mean much to me. Someone might only recall mostly the ones they are inclined to remember, the ones that support their own leanings. I think that is human nature. So without charts quite a few might mean a majority or it just might only mean a very small percentage that is being predominately recalled. I’m not convinced his experience can’t be generalised. Far from it. Maybe someday I’ll go through posts one by one and draw a chart, but my gawd that would extremely time consuming. Still though, at least it could be seen as to whether all your posts that unrepairable problems typically occur at a widespread occurrence at such and such size could at least be shown to be valid, or not.


Last edited by beenthere : 03-02-2007 at .

Originally Posted by beenthere
So ‘quite a few’ doesn’t statistically mean much to me. Someone might only recall mostly the ones they are inclined to remember, the ones that support their own leanings. I think that is human nature. So without charts quite a few might mean a majority or it just might only mean a very small percentage that is being predominately recalled.


I’ve had similar thoughts about the problem of quantifying the reports. I remember one poster with a lot of experience who tried to put it into statistics, something like this: at 8” length, a third of all partners couldn’t take the full length, and/or had significant discomfort a third of the time. That is in the ballpark of what I have seen in the reports overall.

Based on paying a fair bit of attention to the annecdotal evidence, I think it’s fair to present the following observations regarding reports of problems with length:

7.5” length - one in four incidence of significant discomfort or incompatibility with female partners
8” length - one in three incidence of significant discomfort or incompatibility with female partners
much over 8”, the incidence quickly hits one in two

I’m not quite as sure of girth, but think the following is still close to representative, and possibly even conservative:

5.5” girth - one in four incidence of significant discomfort or incompatibility with female partners
6” girth - one in three incidence of significant discomfort or incompatibility with female partners
much over 8”, the incidence quickly hits one in two

In both of these dimensions, the one-in-four incidence hits right at about the 95th percentile in size for that dimension, which indicates a certain consistency to me. That would mean that a female partner would only encounter dimensions these large in one in twenty of her partners; for an average female with 4 male partners in her lifetime (http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/resources/FAQ.html) this means that only one in 4 women would ever even experience a size that large in their entire lifetime, or a woman with relatively more experience of 20 partners (perhaps more typical of Thunder’s Place members’ partners) would only encounter dimensions that big in one of her partners. How’s that for some perspective? It’s relatively impressive that the female vagina can generally accomodate sizes that far from the average, and not surprising that a high incidence of problems would start to occur much further out from the average. And even if the statistical distribution that I’m using from http://www.the-penis-website.com/size2.html is off by a fair amount, it still paints a picture that women’s incidence of discomfort with size starts to occur significantly as the male partner’s dimensions get relatively higher than average.

Reports also indicate that long term partners who experience discomfort and/or incompatibility may experience improvements over time, but some will not. Technique and positioning also help, but do not overcome all problems.

FF


Starting, summer '06: 6" EL, 6.5" BPEL, 5.5" EG / Currently: Approximately .4" length and .25" girth gains / Stretched ligs .5" - .6", increasing PBFL and flacid hang

Goal: 7.25" BPEL x 5.75" EG, currently over HALF WAY THERE! on length and ACHIEVED GIRTH!

Piercings: 4 Gauge PA (currently not wearing), Two 4 Gauge upper frenums, other non-genital

What I have gathered is my goal lenth and girth will be ok for a good pounding!

Goal 7” x 5.5 - 6

Thanks for all the great info!

5x5

If that is indeed the ideal size for pounding 5x5 guy, I am basically there !! :D :D LET THE POUNDING BEGIN !! ;)

I have not met one that dosn’t like a good pounding!

5x5

FrenumFellow,

Depending upon where one looks, I’ve seen it written the average number of partners is four, but I’ve also seen it listed as high as 11. Also, I’m not lately following all the posts closely, but I think there is a recent poll on number of partners (perhaps there is another previous poll here also, I don’t know). Best would be to gather up as many polls and studies as possible and try to draw a conclusion from that. I may get around to doing that someday. Plus, as a side note I’ve also read a study that indicated women lied about the number of partners they had, so as to reduce the true number to a lower number. If that can be shown to be a trustworthy study, then the polls might need to be adjusted upward.

Then, after arriving at the number of partners, when figuring how often women run into these guys one must not forget it’s a twofold calculation since she can meet up with long length or big girth (or both). But even then the twofold odds may need to be reduced some because a while back I studied the size database at Thunder’s and discovered that there is a strong correlation between length and thickness. The longer guys tend (read: not an absolute) to be thicker. I posted the results into a thread or more. Still though, after adjusting the twofold odds back down some, one may need to add into it that bigger dick guys tend to have overall on average twice as many partners. Of course that is just an overall view. There is a poll that indicates this is the case, and it makes sense to me. So if the in general twice as many partners for bigger dick guys is added to the equation then her odds increase.

Speaking of anecdotal, it’s quite apparent many women claim to have had a very thick one, or a very long one, or both. If all the factors that I listed above are calculated I believe it would indicate they aren’t kidding about it. I may gather up all the various polls, various studies, and work out the equation someday. It’s more time than I want to put into it right now. If I do get back into such as this, I’ll probably go ahead and eventually study the 1 in 4 incidence, 1 in 3 incidence, etc, and draw up a chart so that I not only can see if your memory recall is accurate or biased, which I’m curious about, but mainly so that I can know the absolute truth (whether it’s good, bad, or ugly) which is always top priority for me whether it agrees with my opinion or not.


Last edited by beenthere : 03-03-2007 at .
Top
1234

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:47 AM.