Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Kinsey's Penis Insertion Length Percentile Chart Non Black Women

12

Kinsey's Penis Insertion Length Percentile Chart Non Black Women

Howdy yall,

Today I stumbled across something very interesting. Despite my constant Internet research I’d never seen this until I saw it on a bodybuilding. Com thread.

This is supposedly a chart of how much length a woman can accept vaginally and it seems like it may be fairly accurate by my experience.

By my watch, my 6.75” just touches my gf’s cervix, her height is 5’5”. According to the chart this sounds like it’s in the ballpark.

I just wanted to share this with the community and see what the boys at the forum thought.

Does this look accurate to you fellas?

Cheers!

EL 6.75”
MSEG 5.25”
FL 4.25”

Dry jelqs for the win!

Please note that this chart is almost certainly bogus

Attached Images
331kr4m.png
(35.3 KB, 162 views)

Last edited by memento : 06-26-2015 at . Reason: Note on nature of chart added

My wife is 6’2” and I feel as though I touch her cervix when I’m really hard.


Started: 01/01/2015 ~ BPEL: 7.2 inches. EG: 5.5 inches. [05/01/2015: BPEL: 7.6 X 5.5.] [08/06/2015: 7.75 X 5.5] Goal: Better EQ

All hard work brings a profit, but mere talk leads only to poverty. ~ Proverbs 14:23

Forum Guidelines

The Kinsey Insitute themselves link this in their FAQ on vagina size

http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/co…8.full.pdf+html

I wouldn’t be terribly surprised if that’s fabricated, with only a table there is no reliable source. Googling on the table headers brings nothing useful.


Thunder's Place: increasing penis size one dick at a time.

But what would be the motive to fabricate such a thing?

Originally Posted by madnasty
But what would be the motive to fabricate such a thing?

An attention whore and or asshole would fabricate such a thing.

There is a chart out there on the net purported to be Women’s Penis Size Preferences.

The guy put it up on his website to get attention. Got tons of hits. The numbers are just idiotic crazy, so it generated a lot of controversy which kept people coming back to his site.

Eventually he admitted he just made the chart up. He never surveyed women. He completely fabricated the data and the chart.

Occasionally a Thunders member comes across it and posts it, not knowing it is FAKE. Much anxiety and hysteria always ensues. Mods have to come in and tell the real story on it: It is MADE UP BULLSHIT.

I find this chart pretty suspect. Mem gave a great link to a genuine scientific study on Vaginal Size.


Last edited by sta-kool : 06-25-2015 at .

Sta-kool,

You mean “penis size debate” guy?

You know that website made me feel terrible for a while. Did he really admit it was fake? Obviously 6.25 girth being ideal seems a bit high I think, but it still gave me a lot of grief.

At least this chart seems more realistic than the PSD one, in my opinion anyway.

Well, that’s good news.

What a jerk!

Thanks for the input, gentleman.

It’s kinda crazy how many guys get amped up sexually over that kinda shit. I don’t get it, like I don’t get the whole racial-anti-white-male garbage within interracial porn. But wtf, losers are losers.

Originally Posted by BusterHymes
It’s kinda crazy how many guys get amped up sexually over that kinda shit. I don’t get it, like I don’t get the whole racial-anti-white-male garbage within interracial porn. But wtf, losers are losers.

The reality, sucks though like you said.

What that chart shows is the % of women that can accomodate a penis that length — as in what % of women of a certain height a guy with a penis that length WONT bottom out in.

For 5’5” women only 44% can take a whole 6.5”, in 56% of women 5’5” tall a 6.5” dick bottoms out.


Kdong Starting: 7.1 x 5.125 vol = 14.84 cu. in. Current: 7.1BPEL 5.5 MSEG = 17cu. in. GOAL --> 8.5 x 6.5 vol: 28.6 cu. in.

Took Time off, lost some gains-- Girth cemented

No PE since 2015 -- starting back up

The terminology ‘non-black females’ seems strange, how and why study all groups except a single one?

Well IF it’s reliable it shows a very strong breakpoint occurring between 6.5-7”, which seems reasonable given the statistics for men. Either way we know there’s a big variation for depth in women so unless you are with many women averages and statistics don’t matter.


28 Aug 2014: 6.25" x 6" (MEG) >>>>>>>> 30 Dec 2015: 7.25" x 6.5" (MEG)

Goal: Pump 40 min 2x daily 6 mos start 8/23/17 PICS AND PROGRESS

PE Growth Rate Study | Most Efficient Gainers List

My opininon.. 7 X5.5. One size.Fits all.


BPEL 7 EG 5.5 NBPEL 6.5 Flaccid length 4.5. Started Jan 2015 at bpel 6.5 nbpel 6.0 and eg 5.2 flaccid length was 3.5

I have reached my goal. At least for now.

I think this is just a useless chart.

Too bad there is no study that actually looks into this. It would also be interesting to see breakdown for other races as well, and also age groups…would either confirm or disprove a bunch of stereotypes out there.


Current: BPEL 7.9"/NBPEL 6.75" MEG 5.2", BPFL 6.5"/NBPFL 5.5" FG 4.4"

---

Realistic Goal: BPEL 8.5"/NBPEL 7.5" EG 5.5" | Optimistic: BPEL 9"/NBPEL 8" MEG 5.75" | Dream: BPEL 10"/NBPEL 9" MEG 6.5"

Top
12

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:06 AM.