Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Is bigger always better

I hope no-one gets pissed off but here’s what some research suggests. Hi-lites and full article pdfs with more details in links:

Objective: A great deal of men consider that the size of the penis is directly proportional to its sexual power. Some men, who are worried that their penis is too small, wish to be considered for surgical lengthening or thickening procedures. The argumentation for this chiefly points in the direction of women. However, have women actually been asked about the extent to which they consider the size of the penis to be of importance from a sexual point of view? Or asked what they think about ideas surrounding the size of the penis in relation with actual sexual functioning?

Patients and Methods: To address these questions, 375 sexually active women who had recently given birth at the University Hospital Groningen were asked a number of questions about sexual functioning and the importance they attach to the size of their partner’s penis.

Results: A total of 170 questionnaires were returned (response rate 45%); 20% of the women found the length of the penis important and 1% very important; 55% and 22% of the women found the length of the penis unimportant and totally unimportant, respectively. Opinions about the girth of the penis followed the same trend. Length was less important than girth: 21% and 32%, respectively. The women who found the girth of the penis important had the same opinion about the length of the penis (correlation 0.71, p=−0.001). Median division into two subgroups (girth important/unimportant; t-test) did not reveal any significant differences in relation with demographic data. Correlation analysis did not reveal any significant correlation between sexual functioning (measured with the NSF) and opinions about the girth of the penis.

Conclusion: Although clearly in the minority, a nevertheless considerable percentage of the women respondents attached substantial importance to the size of the male sexual organ.

http://www.kozmetikcerrahi.com/indir/penissize.pdf

“To study the effect of penis width vs. length on female sexual satisfaction, 50 sexually active female undergraduate students were asked which felt better, i. e., was penis width or length more important for their sexual satisfaction. None said they did not know or that width and length were equally satisfying. A large majority, 45 of 50, said width was more important (p<.001). Implications are discussed, including the fact that the data seem to contradict Masters and Johnson about penis size having no physiological effect on female sexual satisfaction.”

http://www.biomedcentral.com/conten…72-6874-1-1.pdf


Starting Size: April, 28, 2010: NBPEL-7" Girth-6" (base, MSG, glans)

Currently: BPEL-8" NBPEL-7.25" Girth-6.25" (base)/6.125" (MSG)/6.125" (glans)


Last edited by bohm : 10-10-2010 at .

Bohn:

You certainly have not ruffled my feathers, it only reaffirms my feelings. I have always enjoyed your posts when I was a lurker, you have brought many good and well documented points to the table.

Anna’s postings on settling, at least in part are here:

Rethinking how much size matters to women

I have read her posts in the past. EVERY five incher should take the time to read them, perhaps she will shed some light into your/our thinking.

Honestly, after reading Anna’s thread, I found it made feel worse and most of it was a blur except the part that her ideal size was 8” NBPEL x 6”.


Starting Size: April, 28, 2010: NBPEL-7" Girth-6" (base, MSG, glans)

Currently: BPEL-8" NBPEL-7.25" Girth-6.25" (base)/6.125" (MSG)/6.125" (glans)

Originally Posted by Biomed
…None said they did not know or that width and length were equally satisfying. A large majority, 45 of 50, said width was more important…

:thumbs:

Originally Posted by sparkyx
Is bigger better? It is until it isn’t. :)

Truism, that.
One of my mentors also had the following spin on it: “Only two sizes of dick; too small and too big.”


Running a Massive Co-Front.

I shouldn’t be impressionable but I am. I want close to 6” girth now (will re-evaluateas I go along). I’m going to experiment with oxygen deprivation, and report back with results, assuming there will be some.


Decemeber 2007: 5.8" BPEL x 4.9" MSEG

Current:-------->7.7" BPEL x 5.7" MSEG (7.2" NBPEL)

Current Goal:--->7.6" BPEL X 5.8" MSEG Do or do not, there is no "try".

How are you planning to experiment with oxygen deprivation? You mean clamping?


Starting Size: April, 28, 2010: NBPEL-7" Girth-6" (base, MSG, glans)

Currently: BPEL-8" NBPEL-7.25" Girth-6.25" (base)/6.125" (MSG)/6.125" (glans)

Originally Posted by bohm
Honestly, after reading Anna’s thread, I found it made feel worse and most of it was a blur except the part that her ideal size was 8” NBPEL x 6”.

Your post makes me think of that Gary Larson cartoon “What Dogs Hear”.

That’s the problem with us dick tuggers, we just kind of filter out all common sense when it comes to dick size. Doesn’t matter how many times we hear that dick size is #99 on the Top 100 Most Desirable Traits in Men. All we hear is “8x6”. :)


My Before and After pics -- .5" gain...


Last edited by commanderblop : 10-10-2010 at . Reason: typo

Yes. Machtenx was hilarious with his questions in Anna’s thread:

“Is that 8 inches bone pressed or 8 inches non-bonepressed?? very important”

I would have gone even further:

Anna, could have been spilling her guts out telling us the solution to our existence, the meaning of life, etc. and we wouldn’t give a flying crap.

“Okay, Anna fine about that meaning of life stuff. Now about the penis size. Is that 8” really non-bone pressed or a very light bone press? Is that 6” MSG or Base Girth? etc.” :)


Starting Size: April, 28, 2010: NBPEL-7" Girth-6" (base, MSG, glans)

Currently: BPEL-8" NBPEL-7.25" Girth-6.25" (base)/6.125" (MSG)/6.125" (glans)

Originally Posted by RedJr
I know this has been discussed before and I am beating a dead horse.

I understand the logic, bigger is better, a person wants to be the best that they can be. In theory, it is admirable. But does being the biggest make you a winner and average or less than average (gasp) make you a failure?

Posted from another thread:

******”Doesn’t everyone wanna be the biggest their sexual partner have been with?”*******

Then I should kick this very sweet, honest, sexy lady with numerous other coveted qualities that I have been dating for over a year to the curb. I will never be the biggest she has ever had. She has had one previous partner, her deceased husband of 25 years was 8.5x6 estimated. With this mentality, I am an automatic failure in the sack. Even though I am polite, not hideous, have a credit rating in the 800’s, and have a better body than 90% of the men my age, I will never be good enough? And this is because I will NEVER be able to, with or without PE, have the biggest penis that she has ever had. Or should she have kicked me to the curb? She did not, because in her opinion, there is more to a man than the size of his dick.

Before all of you go off on her for letting me find out that I had to follow a man nearly twice my size, this came out very innocently, we were talking about average sizes. Average height for women and men (we are both shorter than average), average/normal weight and then the conversation turned to average breast size. And then I said, “the average penis size is 6 inches, and her reaction was really? She truly (and I believe this to be honest) thought that all dicks were that big.

It takes an incredible amount of self confidence to follow a man that is twice your size. And she is fine with my size, she has more consistent orgasms (so she says) and stronger/longer ones. Nope, I am not tearing her up inside with my size, I am not stretching her, I am not banging into her cervix (I am guessing that a ways up there now), I will never give her a cult de sac orgasm, there are certain positions I will never excel at, but does all this make me a failure because I am not the biggest she has ever had? I think not.

My point with this whole novel is simple. But knowing me, I will make it long winded. There have been a few threads of men stating depression and anxiety over the size of their penis. Everyone comes to their side and says that average is only 5 1/2, you’re normal, try different positions, yada, yada. But these are the members with 7’s or 8’s giving all this advice, how the heck would they know, they have big dicks. There is an incredible amount of pressure to be the best in this would, which according to society (at least in America) is to have the biggest dick). But no man is a failure because he is not bigger than his partners previous lover. All the 5 inchers out there should be proud that they are trying to improve their selves, even if it is just in EQ. All the 5 inchers out there should post more. If the average (which should mean the majority), would post more, the 5 inchers should dominate these forums. Not the 7.5’s and above, these big boys should be the minority. Guys, it Okay to be normal, don’t be shy. All the 5 inchers out there should know that bigger is not ALWAYS better.

Sorry for the rant. I was not picking on anyone here specifically, just a general impression of the board as a whole. I know I am a new member here, I hope I don’t get chastised for speaking what is on my mind.

I think the active posters are active for a reason. We’re obsessed with PE and do it a lot to get into those high figures.(I’m getting there) Oh and obviously having a 5 incher doesn’t make you a failure in answer to your question. The same as someone born with a 12 incher isn’t a success, he hasn’t achieved anything.

But just to reiterate I think a lot of the active posters you are reading from are big because they’d dedicated quite a bit of time to PE.

I filter all size info through this filter. Many guys here, have been with the same gal while gaining in size. Almost all report greater sexual arousal and appetite in their gal as they get bigger. Now some have reached a point where the woman starts to report discomfort, but most get past that stage and enjoy it even more.

Of course, many also report good head goes out the window as they get bigger, so thats not great, but many guys think its a worthwhile exchange. There has been one or two that I am aware of that report decrease in their gals enjoyment due to discomfort that DOESN’T get better with time.

HOWEVER, I have also read of guys that report their regular woman begins to decrease their sexual contact with them because they are so big that it always requires a lot of foreplay and lube and that gets old after a while.

So, bigger is better, until it not better. So pay attention and take a break if your gal is getting uncomfortable and see if she adapts. If she does, you can start cautiously again. If she doesn’t, best to stop right there. However, that is a fairly rare problem, most guys find their gal significantly increases her sexual responses and frequency.

I filter interviews with women saying bigger isn’t better, with the belief they probably never had a big dicked guy that knew how to use it. Of course that can’t be completely correct, but I like to believe it! :)

Originally Posted by sparkyx
I filter all size info through this filter. Many guys here, have been with the same gal while gaining in size. Almost all report greater sexual arousal and appetite in their gal as they get bigger. Now some have reached a point where the woman starts to report discomfort, but most get past that stage and enjoy it even more.

Of course, many also report good head goes out the window as they get bigger, so thats not great, but many guys think its a worthwhile exchange. There has been one or two that I am aware of that report decrease in their gals enjoyment due to discomfort that DOESN’T get better with time.

Sex is probably better for the woman because the big-dicked guy is enjoying the sex more and has more confidence and higher EQ than he used to.

Originally Posted by scienceguy106
Sex is probably better for the woman because the big-dicked guy is enjoying the sex more and has more confidence and higher EQ than he used to.


I think that if it is the ideal size and girth for a woman where all or most of the sensitive areas are being stretched, pressed, pushed to the proper amount to cause maximum sensory stimulus. Eg, enough length to reach cul de sac, enough girth to press the G spot and stretch the labia minor enough to tug on the clit.

I think when you have all those sensory areas being stimulated at once, she is going to have a heightened experience. Get much larger than that and the discomfort may over ride the pleasure, at least is she isn’t highly aroused. If she is, then it will heighten the pleasure, but will probably be sore for a few days. Great for a one niter, but she might not be crazy about it if you want to bang her every day.

All the major sensory areas for stimulation in and around the vagina indicate that a certain size is needed to get them all with regular intercourse, and unless you want to be poking around at different angles and using fingers, I think it indicates a certain size dick is needed to do it. I seems from members reports that when they increase length and girth beyond a certain point, they mostly report a significant increase in the sexual responses of their long time partners.

Its these reports that for me carry the greatest validity. No other perimeter changed except a larger penis.

Sparkyx summarizes the ups and downs of increased size marvelously.


Please :donatecar to Thunder's Place to keep it running.

Originally Posted by bohm

How are you planning to experiment with oxygen deprivation? You mean clamping?

With a plastic bag big enough to fit over his head.


I'm a big fan of 50 Cent, or as we call him in Zimbabwe, four hundred million dollars.

Top

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:25 PM.