Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Is 6.7 inches.

123

Is 6.7 inches.

.Considered well endowed? That’s what I am now.

Originally Posted by iamthetinman
.Considered well endowed? That’s what I am now.

High end of average, when you get to 7” we are talking huge!


Speak softly carry a big dick, I'm mean stick!

6.7 bone pressed?

Yep

Yeah I’d consider that well endowed. I guess everyone views it differently.

Lifestyles Condoms Penis size study. It found average to be between 5.65” and 5.87”.

Here is a graph of the Penis length data so you can see about where you fall:

Lifestyles_length.gif

Graph is from here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Penis_frequency.svg

For more about the study, and more numbers and graphs:

http://www.mraverage.com/results.htm

Originally Posted by sta-kool
Lifestyles Condoms Penis size study. It found average to be between 5.65” and 5.87”.

Here is a graph of the Penis length data so you can see about where you fall:

Lifestyles_length.gif

Graph is from here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Penis_frequency.svg

For more about the study, and more numbers and graphs:

http://www.mraverage.com/results.htm

I still question that size study. The statistician side of me doesn’t like the fact that many(I’ve read about 1/3) of the participants decided to not go through with it once they found out what was going on. This throws these numbers off considerably.

That being said, 6.7BP is definitely well endowed in the length category. I’m ~7BP(6.625NBP) and have been called well endowed by three of the four women in which I’ve had a sexual encounter.

I got a question. Why do members state their bone pressed stats for length when talking about their size? I can see using the bone pressed method to keep track of gains, but when stating how big your size is, I would think more people would say their non-bone pressed length. I am currently 5.75” NBPEL, and that is what I tell people my size is even though I get approximately another .75”-1” when I use the bone pressed method. Just curious why that’s all.

Originally Posted by Floorit
I got a question. Why do members state their bone pressed stats for length when talking about their size? I can see using the bone pressed method to keep track of gains, but when stating how big your size is, I would think more people would say their non-bone pressed length. I am currently 5.75” NBPEL, and that is what I tell people my size is even though I get approximately another .75”-1” when I use the bone pressed method. Just curious why that’s all.

It’s a bigger number:)

It is also a true number, when you thrush in to a woman as deep as you can, bone pressed length will be entering, I also use it as I’m currently carrying some extra weight that I plan on losing so naturally more of my penis will be exposed once I cut down.

Originally Posted by sta-kool
Lifestyles Condoms Penis size study. It found average to be between 5.65” and 5.87”.

Here is a graph of the Penis length data so you can see about where you fall:

Lifestyles_length.gif

Graph is from here:

Http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Penis_frequency.svg

For more about the study, and more numbers and graphs:

Http://www.mraverage.com/results.htm

Hey. I know this study has been around for a while but did we ever figure out how they got some of these partial percentages with 300 men? For example, I am assuming only the effective volunteers count, so the sample is 300. How do you get .3%, well I can understand how - thats one guy out of 100 if they have simply rounded to the nearest tenth. But what is .1? That would be less than a complete person.


4/2008 Bpel 6.50, Beg 5.5, Mseg 4.9

6/2008 Bpel 6.75, Beg 5.5, Mseg 5.1

9/2008 Bpel 7.00, Beg 5.5, Mseg 5.1

Originally Posted by Floorit
I got a question. Why do members state their bone pressed stats for length when talking about their size? I can see using the bone pressed method to keep track of gains, but when stating how big your size is, I would think more people would say their non-bone pressed length. I am currently 5.75” NBPEL, and that is what I tell people my size is even though I get approximately another .75”-1” when I use the bone pressed method. Just curious why that’s all.

BP is a more consistent measuring method that is far less dependent of bodyfat percentage or “skin creep” than NBP. It’s a good standard for use here.

A proper and practiced BP measuring technique positions the ruler in a repeatable location pressed tightly into the tissue on top of the pubic bone. Since you always press the ruler in exremely hard and record the best measurement possible, there isn’t much room left for fudging or wishful thinking.

Originally Posted by hobby
BP is a more consistent measuring method that is far less dependent of bodyfat percentage or “skin creep” than NBP. It’s a good standard for use here.

A proper and practiced BP measuring technique positions the ruler in a repeatable location pressed tightly into the tissue on top of the pubic bone. Since you always press the ruler in exremely hard and record the best measurement possible, there isn’t much room left for fudging or wishful thinking.

Off to get a quote on having my pubic symphysis shaved/reduced by an inch or so!


4/2008 Bpel 6.50, Beg 5.5, Mseg 4.9

6/2008 Bpel 6.75, Beg 5.5, Mseg 5.1

9/2008 Bpel 7.00, Beg 5.5, Mseg 5.1

Originally Posted by Fantom

Hey. I know this study has been around for a while but did we ever figure out how they got some of these partial percentages with 300 men? For example, I am assuming only the effective volunteers count, so the sample is 300. How do you get .3%, well I can understand how - thats one guy out of 100 if they have simply rounded to the nearest tenth. But what is .1? That would be less than a complete person.

Invisible has some very sensible speculation about this somewhere — in one of the myriad “I Know The Average Penis Size is 9x7 despite all evidence to the contrary” “Is my huge dick tiny?” threads, so it will be hard to track down. Maybe he will see this and chime in. If I come across it I will post it.

Originally Posted by sta-kool

Invisible has some very sensible speculation about this somewhere — in one of the myriad “I Know The Average Penis Size is 9x7 despite all evidence to the contrary” “Is my huge dick tiny?” threads, so it will be hard to track down. Maybe he will see this and chime in. If I come across it I will post it.

I see everything. :eye:

Top
123
Similar Threads 
ThreadStarterForumRepliesLast Post
1.5 inches laterMexmusclePenis Enlargement Basics1512-06-2017 06:02 PM
The (statistical) Truth About Cock SizePriapologistPenis Enlargement25307-23-2017 05:43 AM
4 inches within 5 to 6 years, possibleDevinThaNailerPenis Enlargement Basics2012-01-2009 02:40 AM

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:14 PM.