Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

How to Maximize the process of Gaining Length

Does anybody think boxers, briefs or commando effect PE efforts?

An alternate to an ADS could simply be a heavy or weighted cock ring that can be worn throughout the day…so boxers or commando would be best, I think.


Starting size: 6.25" BPEL (5.5" NBPEL); 6.5" BPFSL; 5.0" MEG (3/2014)

Goal: 6.5" NBPEL (7.25" BPEL); 5.5" MEG

Current size: 6.50" BPEL (5.75" NBPEL); 7.5" BPFSL; 5.25" MEG (11/25/2015)

There is such a device and it is called the circle device. Take a look at it- basically it is a circle device (duuh) you attach behind your glans (the weight varies- there are a few different rings you can order) and you got yourself and ADS. :)

Good idea ^ never heard about the circle device. But it is heavily overpriced even more then other PE devices.

Originally Posted by DomnariRailings
Does anybody think boxers, briefs or commando effect PE efforts?

An alternate to an ADS could simply be a heavy or weighted cock ring that can be worn throughout the day…so boxers or commando would be best, I think.


Clearly yes. boxers or commando. Everything else hampers blood flow an freeballing gives a natural gravity stretch.

Many comfortbale ADS options around.

Yep, I personally recommend the Phallosan. It is indeed overpriced, but it is top quality. :)

Very interesting thread.


07/10/14 - 6.5" BPEL - 5.5" MsEG

29/01/15 - 7" BPEL - 5.5" MsEG

12/10/17 - 7.4" BPEL - 5.6" MsEG

http://www.lpsg.com/105875-circle-d…y-comments.html

That’s the link to someone giving an idea about how to make your own ADS using a padlock (I ignored all the other nonsense).


Starting size: 6.25" BPEL (5.5" NBPEL); 6.5" BPFSL; 5.0" MEG (3/2014)

Goal: 6.5" NBPEL (7.25" BPEL); 5.5" MEG

Current size: 6.50" BPEL (5.75" NBPEL); 7.5" BPFSL; 5.25" MEG (11/25/2015)

The padlock idea is an old one and quite a bad one. It put stress where you don’t want it and bends the penis simply by virtue of it’s inherent weight distribution.


Thunder's Place: increasing penis size one dick at a time.

The best one is the Phallosan.. By far! The only minus is it is just too overpriced!

I have one of those strap hooks that I use…putting my penis in the “eye” of the hook where the nylon strap was attached (just behind the circumcision line). Then simply hook the desired weight, which has to be reasonably light (like a padlock).

Where do did people attach the padlock that force-trained the penis to bend causing problems? I assume it to be no different than hanging.


Starting size: 6.25" BPEL (5.5" NBPEL); 6.5" BPFSL; 5.0" MEG (3/2014)

Goal: 6.5" NBPEL (7.25" BPEL); 5.5" MEG

Current size: 6.50" BPEL (5.75" NBPEL); 7.5" BPFSL; 5.25" MEG (11/25/2015)

Originally Posted by FrozenMallet
…. Can you link the thread where it is explained why/where/how the LOT theory is proven wrong? I’d like to read it. :)
….


Bib’s LOT Theory 101
Bib’s LOT Theory
https://www.thundersplace.org/search.html

Originally Posted by FrozenMallet
….
You might be right that the tunica layers are of major importance, but it is just laws of physics that a thicker object is stretched with more effort and more slowly than a thinner one. Everyone is highly individual and maybe the results you got came from people with very good length potential. I might be wrong (I assume that), but it is physics that prove that this statement is right.
….


It is a ‘law of physics’ that if you stretch an object it becomes longer and thinner. Neverthless hangers gains both lenght and girth. What makes a penis girthier, is a) the amount of blood inside it; b) the circular length of tunica.

When you stetch, your penis is (ideally) withouth blood inside (flaccid); the length of the circular tunica doesn’t add significative resistence, the thickness of it is more important; but think to it ; a girthy penis could have a thinner tunica than a thiny one. The laws of physics are not violated by PE of course, it is just that you have to look at all the details when you want to apply them, and then remember that a living tissue reacts differently to forces than an inanimate thing. If you pull a metallic bar with 1 kg of force everyday, after some year it will break; f you pull your penis everyday, it will become stronger.

Originally Posted by marinera
Bib’s LOT Theory 101
Bib’s LOT Theory
https://www.thundersplace.org/search.html

It is a ‘law of physics’ that if you stretch an object it becomes longer and thinner. Neverthless hangers gains both lenght and girth. What makes a penis girthier, is a) the amount of blood inside it; b) the circular length of tunica.

When you stetch, your penis is (ideally) withouth blood inside (flaccid); the length of the circular tunica doesn’t add significative resistence, the thickness of it is more important; but think to it ; a girthy penis could have a thinner tunica than a thiny one. The laws of physics are not violated by PE of course, it is just that you have to look at all the details when you want to apply them, and then remember that a living tissue reacts differently to forces than an inanimate thing. If you pull a metallic bar with 1 kg of force everyday, after some year it will break; f you pull your penis everyday, it will become stronger.

So by what you just stated, it should be easier to gain if in possession of more girth (not more difficult; due to the permanently thinned tunica). Which means nobody should be working for girth after any extent of length gains have been obtained or vice versa.

Mitosis works on so many different planes that as the deformation occurs, the body stabilizes itself (by thickening to regain the normal to slightly above normal thickness). If in the case you are making, those that have gained are more at risk of injury because they have worn their tunica thin to the point of easy rupture (from the permanent thinning).

The body adapts and will evolve to the new demands of its environment and stresses. It’s not like that theory that we all have a certain amount of adrenaline and once it’s gone it’s gone for good. We are composed of billions of cells that REGENERATE and divide (to multiply).

One possible reason for the illusion of a thinned tunica could simply be that the gainer of length is not allowing full recovery, thus constantly keeping the cells at work to repair, multiply, and reinforce. Hence, “divide & conquer.”


Starting size: 6.25" BPEL (5.5" NBPEL); 6.5" BPFSL; 5.0" MEG (3/2014)

Goal: 6.5" NBPEL (7.25" BPEL); 5.5" MEG

Current size: 6.50" BPEL (5.75" NBPEL); 7.5" BPFSL; 5.25" MEG (11/25/2015)


Last edited by DomnariRailings : 02-04-2015 at .

Originally Posted by DomnariRailings

So by what you just stated, it should be easier to gain if in possession of more girth (not more difficult; due to the permanently thinned tunica).

…..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur_(logic)

I do agree that analogies used to explain PE scientifically tend to illustrate a parallel that our body and it’s structures are the very same as an inanimate object (paper towel core, plastic tubing, metal pipe, rubber band, balloon). None of these objects possess what our body does…living cells that act and react to it’s environment and the stresses within.

I actually believe it is harder to explain why it seems we all have a “set” limit as to how much we can gain in both length and girth. Even more troublesome is to ponder on which would’ve provided each of us with best results (length before girth or girth before length).


Starting size: 6.25" BPEL (5.5" NBPEL); 6.5" BPFSL; 5.0" MEG (3/2014)

Goal: 6.5" NBPEL (7.25" BPEL); 5.5" MEG

Current size: 6.50" BPEL (5.75" NBPEL); 7.5" BPFSL; 5.25" MEG (11/25/2015)

Originally Posted by marinera
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur_(logic)

That’s your opinion.

Don’t have a cow and take things personal…it’s called a debate over thoughts and ideas. It’s not my fault you mentioned both thinning and adapting by reinforcement separately as if it’s one or the other…I personally got lost in translation while reading.

So if you were not trying to state that the tunica is permanently thinned from gains, I have clearly misunderstood.


Starting size: 6.25" BPEL (5.5" NBPEL); 6.5" BPFSL; 5.0" MEG (3/2014)

Goal: 6.5" NBPEL (7.25" BPEL); 5.5" MEG

Current size: 6.50" BPEL (5.75" NBPEL); 7.5" BPFSL; 5.25" MEG (11/25/2015)

Exactly. You added a premise to mines : I don’t know if gaining girth makes the tunica thinner : it would make sense that it becomes thicker, if anything, or at least stronger. But if you take two newbies, one with 5”girth, another with 6” girth, the chances that they have similar tunica thickness are 50/50, no reason to think otherwise.

Beside that, the girth is given by the length of the outer layer of tunica; the inner is what we stretch for length. As I unsderstand it, the outer layer shouldn’t oppose resistence when stretching for length; like the inner layer shouldn’t oppose resistence when you work girth. I never heard anyone claiming that the longer you are, the harder will be gaingin girth: but is the reciprocal of saying ‘More girth, less length gains.’. Corious.

I do believe that if you want to gain (only) length, low EQ helps, because there is less blood inside figthing the stretching force: in this sense, it is true that the girthier you are, the harder is to gain length. If one would be intersted only in length, he should avoid girth work, from a theoretical point of view. And prolonged length work does lower EQ. But who wants to have a flaccid penis for six months just to gain 0.1” more? A mad I think.

Plus, I have noticed that personally: length gained through jelqing is more stable than length gained with just stretching. You don’t need much of ‘cementing’ with jelqs: once you are longer than before for a few sessions, you are longer period.

I guess the sum of all that things aren’t that simple as been thought in the past. Many still holds true ‘theories’ that were just naive thoughts.

Top

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:04 PM.