How AM really works (in my opinion!)

Hi all. I’m an AM practicer and i would like to share my (personal) theory on how AM really works.
Janus’ theory is that it improves the blood flow to the penis. True? Yes and no.

The first day i tried AM, i had one of the best erections of my life. It was seriously great. Then,after the first time, nothing special happened.
Many people said that this was psychological, other said that it was because the penis felt more blood flow after many time.
I think that all of them are wrong. Why? Because, in the first case, if i had psychological issues my penis wouldn’t get rock hard after trying an exercise read on a PE website for only 5 minutes. I must admit i was REALLY skeptical, so i didn’t try to “auto-confirm” that AM worked: at the contrary, i was convinced that it would not probably work for me and, that night, i was really surprised to see one of the best erections i ever had. I was wrong: AM worked.
Regarding the blood flow, i think that this explanation is wrong because only 5 minutes of BE in flaccid state are not enough to grow enough blood vessels to remedy to a 4 years ED.
There was something other going on there.

After doing some research, i had an illumination in my mind: What if the “blood vessels growth” was only an indirect effect of AM? After all, the first 5 minutes gave me extraordinary results and, the day after, my penis looked a bit more full, because of the huge amount of blood flow that went inside it the night before.

I wanted to go deeper and deeper and understand how it was possible that in only 5 minutes i had so much great results. I began to read tons of scientific papers and research but i couldn’t find nothing. Then, almost by chance, i read about a “new technique” performed by 2 doctors (i will not tell their names) that promised to solve venous leakage issues to “up to 80% of men”. I read a lot and i looked for reviews about this kind of surgery.
The interest fact is that people who underwent this kind of surgery had pretty much the same effect of people performing Angion Method: more engorged glans, rock hard erections even after years of ED after only 8 hours from the surgery, better response to PDE5 inibithors, and so on. This attracted my attention. I went even deeper and found out that this kind of surgery targets “pelvic vein embolization”. Not only: in some cases, it targets Deep dorsal vein. It depens on where you have got the venous leakage. Pelvic veins and Deep dorsal veins: does it remember you something?

I tried to respond to myself to a simple question: What is ED?
It’s obviously normal that blood flows out from the penis in a certain measure, but ED, on my opinion, is ALWAYS a venous leakage. There are only 2 possible causes for this:
1. The amount of blood flow that enters inside the penis is less than the amount that naturally flows out from it. Most of the times, PDE5 inibitors work for this 1° kind of men. This because the problem is the poor blood flow amount.
2. The amount of blood flow that enters inside the penis is good or even great, but for some reason, (like in my case is Peyronie’s disease), the venous leakage is way more than the “natural” one we should have: it is a huge amount of blood flow going out, like if you have a broken tire: it doesn’t matter how much you pump air inside it, the tire is broken so even if you keep pumping, you can’t beat the air flow away from the hole.

Some men are in the 1° category and Cialis, Viagra and so on works great. Some other men are in the 2° category so, if they have a “mild” venous leakage, cialis and viagra would help, but if the venous leakage is medium to severe, NOTHING will help, except for an implant. It’s sad to say, but that’s the truth.

So, let’s get back to Angion Method: Angion Method, by stressing the deep dorsal vein, causes it to restrict probably due to the inflammation (or to other process, i don’t exactly know what’s the exact cause) and it provokes a less amount of venous leakage: that means that even the 2° category of men may have a great erection by doing this, simply because it targets the “cause” of ED.
The indirect effect is that, if the venous leakage is removed, even for only 24 hours until the next session, the blood begins to accumulate inside the penis, giving all the sensations like “hardness even while flaccid”, “hearth beat”, “hot penis”.
This causes a great amount of blood flow inside the penis, improving the tissues and letting it appear bigger, especially in girth. New blood vessels form from this process, to sustain the improved amount of blood going there.

BUT ATTENTION: Those are only INDIRECT EFFECTS. The main effect is that AM targets the venous leakage, by making harder from the blood to flow out from the penis. When you suspend Angion Method and the blood begins to flow out again, and the venous leakage returns, you will probably lose all your gains in some time. You have to keep the deep dorsal vein in constant inflammation to have the penis of your dreams. If you noticed Janus’ words, you will see that he suggested to do it once every 8 hours, if i remember well. Causing inflammation once every 8 hours keeps the blood from flowing out, and feeds the process i just described.

FINAL CONSIDERATIONS:
1. As i was noticing from my 17 days experiement, the best results were obtained from people who struggled with ED. THAT WAS NOT A CASE! People with high EQ didn’t notice any benefits or noticed just little benefits, way less than the people with low EQ.
2. AM will NEVER add lenght. It simply can’t. Maybe it will add girth to people with low EQ because of the huge amount that flows inside the penis after much time of struggling with ED, starting a process of revascularization. The gains you noticed in lenght are probably due to a great EQ, better than ever, that made you think that you “gained”, but you didn’t. The penis is just full of fresh blood, making it look bigger both in flaccid and erect state, but you havent got any “structural” permanent gains.
3. AM can possibly dangerous if my theory is right. Why? Because it provokes a constant state of inflammation below the belt, and we can’t know what is the effect of a chronic inflammation in the long run.
4. All the advices that Janus gave are GREAT for overall health, and so for the blood flow, but are not necessary to have results with AM. Things like “if you don’t eat 3000 calories you will not have any gains!” or “if you eat at the restaurant you’ll assume too much salt and probably the blood vessels will not grow” are total bullshit. You will have effects even if you don’t do these things, because you simply don’t let the blood flow out. Simply as hell. (sorry Janus, only my opinion even if i respect and appreciate really much your advices and your theories: i am not attacking you, just saying that if my theory is right, those things are really unnecessary)
5. I noticed that if you rest many days and perform AM again, you have a 110% EQ back. That endorses my theory: because as the inflammation goes away, and your EQ dropped again a little bit, if you perform Angion Method you will reactivate the inflammation and start again the process. That’s why “less is more” as an user said.

6. PROBABLY THE MOST IMPORTANT CONSIDERATION:
What Janus discovered is great for people with ED because, if performed good, it may provide a safe exercise to improve penile health and give back to some men their erections, without any pill. Yes, it can do it.
BUT IT HAS TO BE STUDIED BY A TEAM OF EXPERTS SCIENTISTS. Why? For many reasons, for example: to study the long term effects of AM, the ‘correct procedure’ to follow (not all men are the same, there are anatomical differences and a protocol that works for everyone in the same way should be necessary!), the amount of time that doesn’t damage or give too much inflammation, how much time we may expect the deep dorsal vein to be partially occluded, and so on.

That’s all from me for now. I would be glad to answer ANY questions, and i would like to tell some things. First of all, with this post i didn’t want to attack Janus: i respect him and his theories. I know that i’m not God so my observations may not be right, or maybe they are. I don’t know. That’s what i think about AM, and i hope that this post will be a chance for all to RESPECTFULLY share ideas and opinions, even if our thoughts are different.
I just ask you to remember that no one here “has got the truth”. Not even Janus. That’s not because of lack of intelligence - it’s simply because there are not scientifically proven studies on it.
If i were Janus, i would strongly consider to let someone in the academic world know Angion Method, since if provided good and with a “scientifically proven” protocol, it maybe can be a breakout.

Long story really short: AM targets the venous leakage problem by inflammating the deep dorsal vein. This prevents the blood to flow out from the penis, giving rock hard erections, which bring veiner penis, more blood vessels, and constantly engorged penis.

It is not a permanent cure, but it does the work. Further studies, done scientifically, are necessary to undestand exactly how to perform this exercise in a correct and safe way. If this happens, it may easily be a breakout for many men in the world.

It was a good read, and out of respect to you who took the time to write it, I read the whole thing even though it was long and I try to keep away from Janus’s toxic pseudoscience. You mention many intriguing things, and I find interest in this thread from the perspective you havw really given this endeavor a good go.

Can you tell me more about this study you mentioned regarding those two doctors and link me to the article? I would be immensely interested in this topic.

He did, I read his stuff. It was severely flawed on a great many levels to say the least. It honestly wouldnt get very far and would be obliterated during peer-review before the first paragraph. I say this because even a high school graduate is aware of things he is proposing the opposite of. But I think you are intelligent and have picked up many of them, as you have just now written about a few. But I digress and I see what you are saying, even if his reasoning is baloney; the fact that you say it helped with your erection troubles is not up for dispute. Although I still believe it is a different form of edging and your improvements and vascularity are down to nitric oxide increases. Can I ask, did you try edging before to help with your issue?

I hope you are one day able to completely overcome your issues, I really sympathise with you.

Regards, L-Z

I suggested that this was how it was working some time ago, if this is the case it’s probably not a good idea long term, constant irritation and inflammation always cause problems.

@Lightning-zee: Thank you really much for your words of appreciation. That’s exactly the mood i wanted to see in this post: collaboration and sharing of ideas, not fight. My field is economics and finance, i’m not a doctor so i am totally conscious that i may have misunderstood some scientific papers or bad interpreted some things i read or experimented on myself. But i definitely think that venous leakage is the key of the problem for ED, and consequently the AM "solves" it in some ways, even if only for some hours. Here you can see the study i was talking about: Venous leakage treatment revisited: pelvic venoablation using aethoxysclerol under air block technique and Valsalva maneuver - PubMed

Pay attention to 2 things: 1. The doctor who performed many of this surgery with dr. Herwig was not Sansalone, but Frankling Kuehhas. 2° Thing to pay attention: i read on many forum from people who underwent this surgery that things went really really bad for them. I’m not saying that the doctors are not honest, and i’m not trying to ruin their good reputation - just saying that i read bad experiences from it. Maybe many others who underwent the surgery were really happy, i don’t know, but the people i read about weren’t satisfied, and after some time they decided to use an implant (just look on Franktalk).

@Capernicus, i’m sorry, i didn’t ready your suggestion before - but it seems that we arrived to the same conclusions.

A malfuctioning valve never gets better.It either works or if damaged works to the limit of the damage. Nothing will ever make it work sometimes and other times not. It’s the same as the valve in your kitchen faucet; it either leaks or it doesn’t and if it does leak how much does it leak? Does it leak enough to drive you nuts? If so then you get a new one.

Nice theory; I’ll be back later!

Okay I’m back; did you miss me? Sure!

Okay one sidelight on that thread that I avoid. I find it humorous that some guy comes out of nowhere, says he did some research, and everyone thinks he’s the greatest thing since canned beer. Then as the thread progressed guys with no medical or biological knowledge began not only to make up their own reasons why his method MAY work but they even offered alternative ideas for things that they think might work. So that whole thread is a collection of ideas based off the original premise that irritating a blood vessel causes them to grow, which it does not. So it’s one bad theory followed by more bad theories, all made up with no basis n reality.

What you’re saying here is correct but there does seem to be some cause and effect going on, some
guys do the routine and report better erections.
It seem reasonable to offer up hypothesis as to why it works even though it can’t be proved.
The simple explanation often turns out to be the right one.

Making assumtions though on unproven ideas only takes you deeper into the crap.

Yup. It is one new exercise, which undoubtedly has a very noticeable effect, and then a ton of thought, theory and speculation in a direction, or directions, that have nothing to do with the facts or truth. I tried the exercise and, thinking it would not amount to much, was surprised by my morning erection’s hardness and feel on day three. I thought “Well this guy has really stumbled across something here”. But sometime pretty shortly thereafter, someone posted something to the effect of “The human body is incredibly efficient, and will not just form blood vessels that serve no purpose” and I knew that was correct. Blood vessels are not created to carry O2 and nutrients to, and CO2 and waste away from, non existent tissue. And then the body just creates tissue so these new capillaries will have something to do? Nope. Incorrect.

I should say, I don’t really think this exercise can fix or halt venous leakage though either. I am curious as to how it actually works though, as I have a feeling the improved blood flow will help to maximize gains sought via “traditional PE exercises”.

I base my opinions on the fact fact that the OP had his ED cured after 5 minutes of this method. If that is true, and I hope it is, then his ED was never physical in nature. If it was physical then this cure rates right up there with Christ raising Lasarus from the dead!

Jimmybob, as i said, i opened this post not to fight but to share ideas. It is pretty obvious that you have great problems not only in reading, but even in understanding what you read. I never said: “THIS IS THE FINAL EXPLANATION, ALL FOLLOW ME!”. I only have a personal theory, based on my observations, and i decided to share it, but i told many times that i’m not a doctor and i may easily wrong. But it’s in human nature to see a phenomenon and try to make theories about it.

As capernicus just said, you can’t just ignore the people who had better erections. Science a part, the better EQ it’s a fact. So it is obvious that, even when there’s a venous leakage, AM does “something”.

Last thing i want to say is that you are on a site of PE enlargement. You can’t expect great experiments or incredible studies here. If you’re looking for these, you should fly to some famous university or clinical research center, and follow the trials there. Here we can only look what happens and try to think to why it happens. No one has the truth here, just remember that neither you have got it.

If you want to share observation, ideas or theories, you’re the welcome, i love sharing ideas and opinions - but if you’re here only to say “you’re all idiots, you don’t know anything, AM is totally shit, you ignorants” and so on, then your presence here is really not necessary. Be sure to add something to the conversation or make this post richer with your words, next time you comment.

I am sure you can express your ideas, which i expect to be really valuable ideas, in better ways.
Thank you really much, best regards!

@raybbaby, Thank you for your reply. How do you think AM works exactly, based on your experience?

@Jimmybob: “I base my opinions on the fact fact that the OP had his ED cured after 5 minutes of this method. If that is true, and I hope it is, then his ED was never physical in nature. If it was physical then this cure rates right up there with Christ raising Lasarus from the dead!”

Regarding this phrase, you’re free to think whatever you want. There are many men who struggled with ED for years or decades and, after vascular surgeries, for some time had a normal sexual life. Unfortunately, it was not a long-term solution, and that’s why it was abandoned as a treatment method.
I can assure you that my problem is totally physical, and that night i didn’t expect to have that erection. I didn’t have something like that in YEARS. Just read raybabby’s comment: neither he expected improvements in EQ, but it happened. If i was a single case, you could think that it was all in my head. But in the thread you can see many people that had some good effects from AM, even people who struggled with ED all the life. This mean something to me.

BTW, i am really curious to hear your personal theories about AM and how it works. Can you please provide us your point of view?

Sure Hope in a bit when I have some more time.

ED is a horrible thing for men. I feel bad for every guy that suffers with it. The causes are many. What I do know from years of living and doing what I do is that a problem that is physical in nature just doen’t get cured with 5 minutes of exercise. You don’t think that urologists over the years in treating men with ED have recommended just about everything under the sun to help these guys out? I m sure that some may have suggested just about every type of physical manipulation to see if anything would help. Afterall they can’t make the condition worse can they?

If a tissue, organ, appendage doesn’t function it is very rare to go from no function to function in just a few minutes. Running your fingers over whatever vein you choose does nothing unless you really believe it does. Like I have told others; use the same method on the basilic or cephalic veins ( the veins you see on the back of your hand) for a month and see if anything, and I mean anything, happens. And the veins in your hands are the same as the rest of your veins.

Agree completely in this case.

Plenty other guys noted an effect though after days or weeks, it’s interesting that in a lot of cases the effect seemed to wear off after a while.

If this really was a cure than it should be shouted form the rooftops for all to hear. ED is horrible. What would be more horrible would be to tout this as a cure and when an ED sufferer doesn’t get cured, well those are the guys that want to go kill themselves. No playing with your blood vessels did nothing to physically cure you. How you got cured I have no idea but I write this for all those members who read this and those lurkers who read to not expect to be cured of physical ED from this method.