Originally Posted by cantlook
There sure are a lot of claims of gains of 2” and higher… some even over 3.5” if I am reading it right. More growth than I would have expected, or might possibly believe.I would do it myself but I wouldn’t know where to start as far as how to accurately process the data… but at 9 years later, we must have much more data to pull from.
I’d love to see that graph with the 9 years extra data too. If I had a cool enough stats program, I’d do it myself too.
Regarding big gainers. Based on all the stats I know (which is more than the average bear, but I’m no stats expert) penis starting size and total size gains are both positively skewed Gaussian distributions. It’s fairly obvious based on the shapes of all the distribution graphs we have. So most of the big gainers in the database are telling the truth since their frequency fits pretty well with the expected Gaussian curve. Sure there are a few bullshitters in there, but they are the exception - otherwise they all managed to coordinate their lies into a perfectly fitted Gaussian distribution, which I highly doubt. The problem is and always will be that the 60% of guys who gain less than the average amount (and especially the 30% of guys who gain less than half the average amount) will always have trouble believing the 1% of guys who gain triple the average amount, and an even more difficult time believing the 1 in a thousand who gain 5x the average amount.
Some numbers from Slipstream’s thread.
5% gain 1.8” or more
2% gain 2.2” or more
1% gain 2.5” or more
0.4% gain 3.0” or more
0.1% gain 3.5” or more
Median gain 0.6”
Average gain 0.7”