Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Cnn- size matters


Yeah it was.

Umm what? This did nothing but confuse me. The subject matter and the writing jumped around a whole lot, first it was about cock size then talking about fuzzy earlobes.

5.3" NBPEL.

BPEL 6.5-6.7" Goal: Anything!

Girth: 5" but getting bigger. ;)

it’s funny how when the subject matter is posted, seldom is there any comments. Girls like big cocks, not little ones. Oh my!

That has to be the worst ‘study’ I’ve seen.

Yeah, I’m no scientist, but saw this and thought it was relevant. Clicking around, there is more interesting content

And here…fulltext=phrase

I actually recall a similar topic on this a few years ago. The basic question was, if penis size was so important, wouldn’t we evolve with larger penises. I didn’t have time to read that much, but I think that’s what some of this is suggesting. Humans have evolved with larger penises compared to other primates due to selection.

So the whole package counts

The article pretty much tells us what most of us already know. Women (and men) are interested in the whole package, body size and penis. Penis size is more important to taller men because people expect proportionality. A big penis is a plus for shorter men. Even so, a woman may find a taller man with an average penis more desirable than a shorter man with a bigger than average penis. No one is going to sleep with some very ugly man with big penis, unless he has a very big wallet.


I know ( in person ) ugly men ( two ) with very big penises fuking very pretty girls ( nearly models ) ! ! !

I get pretty annoyed that people make a career out of discovering the obvious.

Women prefer taller, fitter, and better hung, roughly in that order of preference. When considering physical attributes, size makes a difference but its far from the most important.

“I was like, Am I gay? Am I straight? And I realized...I'm just slutty. Where's my parade? What about slut pride?”

― Margaret Cho

Again - I think the interesting point that is made in some of this research is this

“So have women been responsible for the male penis getting larger—at least over the course of evolution? That’s a distinct possibility, the researchers say”

Why do I find the results of this study to be immensely depressing, I don’t even sleep with women? Probably because I think the phenomena is probably even more pronounced in the gay community…

Start (Oct 2010) NBPEL: 5, BPEL: 5.875 inches, BASE GIRTH: 5.25 inches, MID GIRTH: 5

(November 2013) NBPEL: 5.875, BPEL: 6.625 inches, BASE GIRTH: 5.625 inches, MID GIRTH: 5

Goal NBPEL(7-7.5)xMEG(5.5-6) (journal)

I wish the article was open-access as I don’t find the summaries to be terribly satisfying. It looks like a pretty strong randomized design was used and there are some interesting findings related to non-linearities in the effects and interactions across body-types. While the findings may be nothing new in a global way, the paper quantifies the relationships, attaches variance explained and effect sizes, and so confirms and also elaborates many details of our intuitions about how these things work. Science is no better when it trashes our intuitions or confirms them; it’s only a question of doing it well. And this looks to be a pretty good study, but that’s hard to say without seeing the actual paper.

It’s PNAS though so I think they have to say something about evolution. That’s just how things work there.

Do you think that women a hundred years ago saw as many penis images as they do now?

You can’t sort for something you don’t know exists.

Women traditionally sort for ability and assets in men.

Only recently have women had more of their own assets, and so the pairing choices have changed.

Began December 2009 at 5 7/8" length and 5" girth.

As of December 5th 2012 7 3/8" BPEL and 6 1/8" base girth.

Going for the magic 8"x6"

Wasn’t it until just recently (in the grand scheme of things) that women had very much choice in anything? I mean, hasn’t it been the men choosing their mates in most societies?

Don’t get me wrong, I am 100% towards equality, but that’s just not how the world was or is in some places even today. If one gender is influencing evolution it seems to me that men’s choices would have influenced women’s evolution, not the other way around.

Keep an open mind and a closed wallet... unless it's open to making a donation!

I think women have always made the final choice when it comes to a mate.

The man merely thinks he has made the choice.

She’s just not using dick size as a primary criteria.

Young women not sorting for a mate have more opportunity to see dicks these days, and obviously desire to try the bigger units when available to them, but its s rare female who makes size the top criteria in choosing a partner for any reason.

In reading the book Baby Wars it has been shown that at least 20% of a woman’s second child is not the designated partners, and a full 30% of third children are from another man.

To a man these numbers seem absurd and shocking, but most women I mention this too are oddly quiet about the subject.

So why is this so?

Genetic diversity apparently.

Began December 2009 at 5 7/8" length and 5" girth.

As of December 5th 2012 7 3/8" BPEL and 6 1/8" base girth.

Going for the magic 8"x6"

Similar Threads 
ThreadStarterForumRepliesLast Post
Matters of sizerichard098Penis Enlargement Basics101-30-2007 02:25 AM

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:08 AM.