Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Auto Jelqer

View Poll Results:

What do you think of this concept

It is good

2569.44%

It is bad

1130.56%
Total Votes: 36. You may not vote on this poll
1234

Auto Jelqer

After little while (okay maybe a bit more than a little while) of thinking about how I can make PE work into other activities, such as studying lectures, jobs, and other stuff that requires your, for most exercises it is easy, but one problem that befuddle me was the jelq, it wasn’t that it was hard to think of ways to build an auto jelqer, in fact that was easy, the hard part was thinking of ways for the auto jelqer not to be a complex mess. I started going about it thinking that the hardest part was the act of building the auto jelqer easily would be to 1; coordinate the clamping and backwards and forwards movement, and 2ND;getting the backwards and forwards movement with relatively minimal complexity. Coincidentally my printer stopped spouting ink, there was my solution. My solution for the clamping coordination did not come so quick, I often grappled with electronics and sensory solutions to mechanical and transfer of force solutions. Well the latter prevailed and proved itself to work best on paper and in my head. I have attached an image to my post that should explain alot. If you have any questions just as me. Pardon the untidiness I made this just to today. More concepts that are cleaner and computer generated will come hopefully, and I hope to eventually have a basic CAD model soon.

Like any pe exercise, you want to be able to have complete control over the exercise as you are doing it…

Using an automated machine to jelq for you is asking for a serious injury.

Careful now…


See Ya,

BigJ

Hey, where’s the picture? Got funding yet? Funding is a good step.

When it comes to jelqing I think it should always be done by hand. When you jelq manually you are in total control of your penis and you can stop whenever you sense injury nlike the autos which need a bit of time to remove.

PS, do you like chemistry? Your username is Avogadro6022 for Avogadros constant, 6.02 by 10 to the 23rd power?

Damn, BCB got banned already? What did he do?


Obsession is a word used by the lazy to describe the dedicated.

My Pics

AOM's training log

If your skills at computer designing your auto-jelqer are as good as your skills at making a computer attachment, we are in trouble. :)

Originally Posted by gprent
If your skills at computer designing your auto-jelqer are as good as your skills at making a computer attachment, we are in trouble. :)

:rolling:

Gimli


Start: May 12, 2007 BPEL: 5.551" EG: 4.646" FL: 3.051" FG: 3.858" Please Fill Out My Survey: Click Me!

Now: July 13, 2007 BPEL: 6.250" EG: 5.500" FL: 3.346" FG: 4.488"

Goal: BPEL: 7.000" EG: 6.000" FL: 5.000" FG: 4.750"

BigJ and aom91, the only difference between this and a manual exercise is that the manual exercise is not as consistent, and if you do sense and injury coming along you just let it jelq once through then reset it to a lower pressure level, not enough time to cause an injury, and since the downward motion is only as powerful as the motor moving the armature linearly then It can be made that it won’t let the thing fully clamp if a certain pressure builds up in your penis

Aom91, yes I do enjoy chemistry but I am not that good

Bigcableclamper I finally made a photobucket account so I can hotlink it which is probably easier then waiting for a moderator, I don’t think it will be beyond my budget but if you would like to contribute be my guest.

Something I forgot to mention, this is a clamped jelqer, not for people new to PE, the only reason I posted this in the newbie forum is because I tend to read instead of post, if this does make it into becoming an actual working auto jelqer this the way I intended to be so people to get on me for being unsafe
Penis should be clamped but still slightly soft
Because of the nature of clamping and restricted blood flow I will not intend for it to be used for more then 15 minutes without refreshing the blood flow to the penis
And it should be used to the point of safety as always

Now these only hold true if it actually comes to being but I am rambling; just one last thing
Anyone who wants to help or collaborate in designing and eventually building this just PM me your ideas, remember I already have the basic design down so I am not going to do a complete overhaul until I have refined this one. And I will hopefully be allowed to put the complete set of plans on thundersplace when it is done so all PEers can build one

Attached Images
avo.jpg
(64.0 KB, 317 views)

Originally Posted by gprent

If your skills at computer designing your auto-jelqer are as good as your skills at making a computer attachment, we are in trouble. :)

Believe me I am far better at designing stuff then navigating forums, but I was pretty sure I attached it, maybe it didn’t take

What if it were just like the “power jelq” in so much as you could adjust the tightness using wingnuts or similar. The back and forth action could be akin to a piston on a crank shaft. Then all the electronics that would be needed is a rheostat to control piston speed. (Crude, but functional.) A vacuum head attachment could hold the penis for the “back-stroke”.

.

Originally Posted by aom91

Damn, BCC got banned already? What did he do?

Forget I think I found out. Hmm…He should have just left it alone.


Obsession is a word used by the lazy to describe the dedicated.

My Pics

AOM's training log

Gerrykjohnsons

You could do it if the crankshaft was opposite your body. Right now I am only working on the system for clamping so it could be easily implemented, the only problem I see is that it adds a layer of work, but it does reduce a layer of complexity, I could see the rod bumping into your penis but that could be fixed by offsetting it. That is probably a really good idea. It would also take up more room though. Possibly more electricity depending on what you use as the material. I thought about this before, but didn’t think of way I could get it to work until now.

Originally Posted by Avogadro6022
You could do it if the crankshaft was opposite your body. Right now I am only working on the system for clamping so it could be easily implemented, the only problem I see is that it adds a layer of work, but it does reduce a layer of complexity, I could see the rod bumping into your penis but that could be fixed by offsetting it. That is probably a really good idea. It would also take up more room though. Possibly more electricity depending on what you use as the material. I thought about this before, but didn’t think of way I could get it to work until now.

Opposite? You mean perpendicular? I was thinking of a device which would mimic the roller-based jelqing device. I was thinking you would adjust the tightness of the rollers via nuts. Then you would adjust the piston stroke by a similar slot-based method. The glans of the penis would be held at a fixed position via vacuum. (Also, this would dictate all the other adjustments, I imagine.) Then you would turn on the device and jelq-away….

.

Originally Posted by gerrykjohnsons

Opposite? You mean perpendicular? I was thinking of a device which would mimic the roller-based jelqing device. I was thinking you would adjust the tightness of the rollers via nuts. Then you would adjust the piston stroke by a similar slot-based method. The glans of the penis would be held at a fixed position via vacuum. (Also, this would dictate all the other adjustments, I imagine.) Then you would turn on the device and jelq-away..

.

I don’t quite know what your getting at maybe you could draw it. I don’t see why you would need the vacuum as long as the clamps released at the end went back to the base and re-clamped there. I get everything about the tightening but I don’t understand what is driving your back and forth motion

Originally Posted by Avogadro6022

I don’t quite know what your getting at maybe you could draw it. I don’t see why you would need the vacuum as long as the clamps released at the end went back to the base and re-clamped there. I get everything about the tightening but I don’t understand what is driving your back and forth motion

I’m thinking if you don’t hold the penis in a known position you’re bound to destroy it. The vacuum attachment would hold the glans - thereby holding the penis shaft in a known position.

.

Top
1234
Similar Threads 
ThreadStarterForumRepliesLast Post
Auto extender.does it workminimeePenis Enlargement Basics307-13-2007 11:54 PM
Hanging RoutineDickstructionPenis Hangers902-07-2006 03:18 AM

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:49 AM.