How about you stop making generalisation based on yours?
Every single thing you’ve said in this thread is based on you being in love with your chopped up dick. As others have said, that’s totally cool. Hats off to every and anybody who is happy with it.
The point you are missing (despite the fact that you say you aren’t) is that 20 years down the road some kid (not necessarily your kids but anything is possible) may(as in there is a possibility, nothing written in stone) be pissed off with having a crazy important(whether you want to admit that or not) part of their God Rod(It helps create life doesn’t it?;) cut off.
You say you know people or have heard of cases of the opposite. Where people are pissed they didn’t get it cut off. That’s silly because they have the option of going and getting it cut off. Problem solved. Being upset about something so simply solved is asinine. Getting foreskin back is far more complicated and parts of your wang are irrevocably gone(provided the operation was done as a neo-natal procedure. If you waited until the cock was done growing then those parts are left there just fine even with a circumcision). Some of the most sensitive parts. I’ve never seen any studies done on how long cut or intact men can last so it would be wise to stop assuming that intact men don’t last as long. Especially considering study have been done suggesting (and by suggesting I mean saying) that your average dude (no reference to cut or intact) last around 2 minutes.
The disease myth is completely irrelevant because you should be using protection intact or cut.
Cleanliness of the penis is based on how much you clean. Do you actually think that the penis head will be cleaner rubbing up against things? You do realise that hands are pretty much the dirtiest part of your body and you ass is one of the cleanest?
Also it’s not North America were being cut is the norm, but merely the United states. Every other country in the whole damn world has more intact men in it than cut.
As for the whole less friction thing some people have said:
Yeah, clearly having as much friction as possible during sex is the best possible course of action. Which is why all those lube companies went out of business 20 years ago right.?
On a somewhat related but I think off topic note:
I once read an article by a sexologist who said that without smegma sex wouldn’t exist in the animal kingdom. That it acted as an additional layer of lube on top of that provided by the foreskin (but less friction is bad right.) and that without no female in would have sex as it would simply be too unpleasant.
I found this a bit odd, as I’ve never personally had any smegma. Even that month I went without showering.
