I just noticed something odd that may be leading to misunderstandings, and I’ve seen it with no other forum.
When I read the e-mail of the new thread postings, there is misattribution. For example it looks like Krod said “I love my circumcised penis” but he was just quoting someone. So if I clicked the link right above that text in the email and a browser opened on that posting so I could click “quote” and enter a reply, I might be responding to ideas that were not his.
I’m going to have to be more careful and re-read once I get to the actual forum.
TLC, you’re basically saying everything I’ve experienced is a “figment of my imagination”, right? (Finally, getting to use that phrase…from Shawshank Redemption for you film buffs). Here I am, one who lived through 27 years of uncircumcised penis experience. I stated both good things and bad…or rather, things I find undesirable with and I even stated that cut or uncut, as long as you keep your genitals clean that there would not be real issues—which is a huge point argued by anti-circ guys like yourself. Weird. Odd how you attacked me for basically supporting the anti-circumcision argument.
Anyway, I think I really would have more grounds to debate the issue since you clearly don’t have a clue what it’s like to have a real uncircumcised penis. Oh sorry, your restoration idea doesn’t count. Like I said, I had been uncircumcised for 27 years. Been 2 years into my procedure and I am extremely glad I had it done. Your analogies need some work, by the way.