Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Dr. Adams Chem PE Again

1234

Hello, this is my very first thread reply and would love to start a progress report on my ChemPE. I have the luxury to actually speak to Dr. Adams in person as I am located in Toronto Ontario. I’ve started the ChemPE program in Mid July, I’ve gained half an inch in length and little over half an inch in girth.

I want to make some things clear. The injection alone without the recommended stretching and cream will only provide girth gains as Dr. Adams advice. He said roughly 70% of your length gains will be based on simple manual stretches. He suggest to stretch for 2-3 minutes every 2-3 hours per day without rest days. The additional main update of the program is that we are given a cream to break down the tunica so while we stretch every few hours we also apply this cream which speeds the process of length gains. The beauty of the injections is that once you manage to find the correct dosage to keep your penis erect for no longer then 2 hours you can inject right before you go to bed. Also, he shows you where to inject so that you never have to use any restricting device (cock rings, etc)

Overall I’m please as I do see some other patients who are under the same program. The injections that I do every other day, or other 2 days, my erections have gotten more firm. My girlfriend even noticed the length, girth gains and plus how hard I last during our sex sessions. If you decide to inject with whatever you decide to mix, please understand that you are only trying to obtain a firm erection for 2 hours, not to see your penis expand beyond your limits. This is suppose to compliment your nocturnal erections putting your or is back into the puberty stages giving you steady girth gains. I will hopefully eventually share my full findings as majority of his patients are on track to gain 0.25 - 0.50 inches per month then it plateaus.

Important note, if you have been manually stretching for some time and have seems gains or have not after several months of being consistent, what scared me was that Dr, Adams advise that once you’ve taken that route of PEing it will be difficult to see gains through his ChemPE Program as you may have toughen the tunica of your penis but there are much older patients who do see gains but not as quickly as other patients who are new to any PEing program. Average patients has gained 3 inches in length.

I hope this helps since this was my first post ever.

I’m not going to repeat what others have been said, just quote one of them for all:
“Sorry, this one may ruffle a few feathers, but no more hurt and no more rip-off’s!

Sadly, I have grown to despise the mere mention of this man’s name. I spent over two years doing research on his work and his claims. This started many years ago and I found myself embroiled in it because of a Yahoo Group I operate and blind faith in something that might have held promise.

Anyone intersted in Ken Adams needs to start their research at the U.S. Patent Office (the original patent filings end in the numbers 5159) and then follow the checkered and bizarre trail that has been left behind.

There is nothing in this that follows traditional medical proofs and research guidelines. Beware……..

I am working with several MD’s on a chemical protocol, but after following the Adams stuff to the end of the rainbow I found a bucket of lead.

I worked with a PA and we injected ourselves and tried everything in the original patent report and found everything there to be totally a fantasy falsehood. Adams posting at one time existed in about 20 places. The boards this stuff was posted on were in numbers. Suddenly, the poster retracted everything he said stating that he was deliberately deceiving everybody and at virtually the same date through a prestigious law firm in Washington D.C. specializzing in patent filings a patent filing was submitted. The patent filings are so vague as to be a joke and they are filled with infomation that is medically impossible as it is stated in the patent applications. There are many things that are brought into question if you really read these reports carefully. They read like a PE porno story and are just too “claim filled” without any photographic proof to back up the claims.
Lots of claims, no evience in the original protocol at all.
……..”
http://www.lpsg.com/134230-dr-ken-adams.html

A look here seems to show that the quoted guy is right
http://patents.justia.com/inventor/kenneth-w-adams

Among the inventions:
“METHOD AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATMENT AND PREVENTION OF BROAD SPECTRUM VIRUS AILMENTS COMPRISING A CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKER OR A CALMODULIN BLOCKER
Application number: 20120245145
Abstract: In the broadest aspect, the invention provides a composition for and a method of prophylactic and/or therapeutic treatment of a animal/mammal for any viral disease, mixed bacterial and viral infections, bacterial infections….”

So he has invented Panacea.The patent application is so vague to mean about nothing.

If anybody who has done PE will unlikely have gains from his protocol, then there is only one logical conclusion : that the gains you can have with his treatment are the same gains you can have without his treatment, and are given only by natural PE. Occam’s razor.


Last edited by marinera : 09-11-2013 at . Reason: link and grammar

Originally Posted by Paradigm
majority of his patients are on track to gain 0.25 - 0.50 inches per month then it plateaus…

Average patients has gained 3 inches in length.

Link please? If this is legit and being done by a medical doctor he should have rather solid documentation including pictures.


Running a Massive Co-Front.

I find it rather strange and also interesting that this particular doctor is suddenly doing this treatment again. Especially after randomly discontinuing it many years ago for a few years - most likely because not many got the remarkable results claimed in the patent. Paradigm, definitely keep us updated on your progress/routine/protocol, though. Definitely interested to hear about it and how this goes.

Originally Posted by Atmospheric
I find it rather strange and also interesting that this particular doctor is suddenly doing this treatment again. Especially after randomly discontinuing it many years ago for a few years - most likely because not many got the remarkable results claimed in the patent. Paradigm, definitely keep us updated on your progress/routine/protocol, though. Definitely interested to hear about it and how this goes.

Even charlatans need money.


A well tailored suit is to women what lingerie is to men.

A well PE'd Penis gives girls the "Wow Eyes"

I :surf: therefore I am

Oh, of course money is the main factor. I would just assume that he would have kept going with the whole thing, rather than stopping entirely a few years ago. Perhaps he was hoping people would forget.

Originally Posted by marinera
I’m not going to repeat what others have been said, just quote one of them for all:
“Sorry, this one may ruffle a few feathers, but no more hurt and no more rip-off’s!

Sadly, I have grown to despise the mere mention of this man’s name. I spent over two years doing research on his work and his claims. This started many years ago and I found myself embroiled in it because of a Yahoo Group I operate and blind faith in something that might have held promise.

Anyone intersted in Ken Adams needs to start their research at the U.S. Patent Office (the original patent filings end in the numbers 5159) and then follow the checkered and bizarre trail that has been left behind.

There is nothing in this that follows traditional medical proofs and research guidelines. Beware..

I am working with several MD’s on a chemical protocol, but after following the Adams stuff to the end of the rainbow I found a bucket of lead.

I worked with a PA and we injected ourselves and tried everything in the original patent report and found everything there to be totally a fantasy falsehood. Adams posting at one time existed in about 20 places. The boards this stuff was posted on were in numbers. Suddenly, the poster retracted everything he said stating that he was deliberately deceiving everybody and at virtually the same date through a prestigious law firm in Washington D.C. Specializzing in patent filings a patent filing was submitted. The patent filings are so vague as to be a joke and they are filled with infomation that is medically impossible as it is stated in the patent applications. There are many things that are brought into question if you really read these reports carefully. They read like a PE porno story and are just too “claim filled” without any photographic proof to back up the claims.
Lots of claims, no evience in the original protocol at all.
.”
http://www.lpsg.com/134230-dr-ken-adams.html

A look here seems to show that the quoted guy is right
http://patents.justia.com/inventor/kenneth-w-adams

Among the inventions:
“METHOD AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATMENT AND PREVENTION OF BROAD SPECTRUM VIRUS AILMENTS COMPRISING A CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKER OR A CALMODULIN BLOCKER
Application number: 20120245145
Abstract: In the broadest aspect, the invention provides a composition for and a method of prophylactic and/or therapeutic treatment of a animal/mammal for any viral disease, mixed bacterial and viral infections, bacterial infections.”

So he has invented Panacea. The patent application is so vague to mean about nothing.

If anybody who has done PE will unlikely have gains from his protocol, then there is only one logical conclusion : that the gains you can have with his treatment are the same gains you can have without his treatment, and are given only by natural PE. Occam’s razor.

Marinera, could you elaborate about the progress on your work on Chem PE? Do you see any promise in it?

Crap, I just saw that you were quoting from another forum. Very sorry!

Well, I’m not convinced by the stuff criticizing the guy for making vague patents. I am included on a few patents myself, and I can hardly understand the ones that are mine, to be frank. There’s a word for it: “legalese”. The lawyers make them absolutely as vague as it is possible to. THe lawyers have to, as if patents aren’t vague then they are worthless. Otherwise, someone can always find some trivial workaround and steal your idea on some technicality.

Just wanted to put that out there. I haven’t looked at them specifically. But it takes a lot more than hearing that guy’s patents are vague to make me think less of him, as patents are always vague.

Originally Posted by sentii
Just wanted to put that out there. I haven’t looked at them specifically. But it takes a lot more than hearing that guy’s patents are vague to make me think less of him, as patents are always vague.


No. Vague patents is not always the case, as Apple, Microsoft or Ken Adams might make you think. Admittedly, I had the same thought a few years ago: a patent on ‘injecting whatever seems beneficial into a penis’ is so vague that it’s ridiculous (try patenting a box with windows and four wheels). Granted, he fluffed it up to dozens of pages under-laid with empirical data that could be produced out of thin air.

On a side-note to adc666: Okham’s razor does not imply statistical nonsense. There is a difference between logical and empirical conclusions.


Sssnrgd..

.Clickdiclack.Rrndhgzzirp..

."Wow!"*

This is an very old thread with nothing outcome at the end. Because the man in concern is waiting for a titration of a cream from last two months and god knows how long will that take. So be patient.

Is there anyone in the Toronto area interested in Chemical PE?

Im not sure what all the ridicule is all about, in fact I personally find it annoying and a waste of my time. I mean who do you think you are the Robin Hood of Penis Enlargement? Is all you have to say is his patents are vague and where is the proof? Empirical or Logical, Im not sure where you are coming from but not everyone had failed results with him methods. I personally have tried the approach and got positive results. I will admit more empirical results need to be forth comming but the principle behind the concepts involved are in my personal experience sound. If you apply constant pressure on any human system it will grow or change. Like braces or all sorts of other known methods. Chemical PE may be in its infancy, but Adams started something and people are finding the ways. In any event my research and experience show me there is gold for some at the end of this rainbow, perhaps now for all but at least for some. I did it for just a short while, but I didn’t stretch at all just injected and went from 7.1 to like 7.75 and from like 4.9 to 5.25 in like 2 months. So it works perhaps not as much as possible but it has worked for me. I would like to know more of why you think one ChemPE works over another?

Originally Posted by marinera
I’m not going to repeat what others have been said, just quote one of them for all:
“Sorry, this one may ruffle a few feathers, but no more hurt and no more rip-off’s!

Sadly, I have grown to despise the mere mention of this man’s name. I spent over two years doing research on his work and his claims. This started many years ago and I found myself embroiled in it because of a Yahoo Group I operate and blind faith in something that might have held promise.

Anyone intersted in Ken Adams needs to start their research at the U.S. Patent Office (the original patent filings end in the numbers 5159) and then follow the checkered and bizarre trail that has been left behind.

There is nothing in this that follows traditional medical proofs and research guidelines. Beware..

I am working with several MD’s on a chemical protocol, but after following the Adams stuff to the end of the rainbow I found a bucket of lead.

I worked with a PA and we injected ourselves and tried everything in the original patent report and found everything there to be totally a fantasy falsehood. Adams posting at one time existed in about 20 places. The boards this stuff was posted on were in numbers. Suddenly, the poster retracted everything he said stating that he was deliberately deceiving everybody and at virtually the same date through a prestigious law firm in Washington D.C. Specializzing in patent filings a patent filing was submitted. The patent filings are so vague as to be a joke and they are filled with infomation that is medically impossible as it is stated in the patent applications. There are many things that are brought into question if you really read these reports carefully. They read like a PE porno story and are just too “claim filled” without any photographic proof to back up the claims.
Lots of claims, no evience in the original protocol at all.
.”
http://www.lpsg.com/134230-dr-ken-adams.html

A look here seems to show that the quoted guy is right
http://patents.justia.com/inventor/kenneth-w-adams

Among the inventions:
“METHOD AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATMENT AND PREVENTION OF BROAD SPECTRUM VIRUS AILMENTS COMPRISING A CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKER OR A CALMODULIN BLOCKER
Application number: 20120245145
Abstract: In the broadest aspect, the invention provides a composition for and a method of prophylactic and/or therapeutic treatment of a animal/mammal for any viral disease, mixed bacterial and viral infections, bacterial infections.”

So he has invented Panacea. The patent application is so vague to mean about nothing.

If anybody who has done PE will unlikely have gains from his protocol, then there is only one logical conclusion : that the gains you can have with his treatment are the same gains you can have without his treatment, and are given only by natural PE. Occam’s razor.

I know he gets a bad rap, but what about Ronielle? Basically the same approach as Doc Adams, and he has pictures. So, I don’t know?

Top
1234

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:53 PM.