Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Chemical PE: The Long Awaited Evidence

Thread Closed

I have actually read that study.

The patient probably had some sort of underlying medical condition. Its unlikely that a healthy person would double the girth of their penis by accident.

“Shortly after his marriage he observed that when he donned his tights, in which he appeared during his exhibitions, that his appearance was quite unseemly. In order to rectify this condition, he devised a harness so adjusted that he could strap the penis to the scrotum between his testicles. For several years he utilized this apparatus when he appeared in the ring; but frequently when performing his gyrations the organ would become twisted, causing pain, tenderness, and swelling, lasting for several days, followed by a subsidence to his normal condition.

After using the apparatus for the space of two years he observed that the organ was increasing greatly in size. This condition was unaccompanied by pain”

Sounds like mechanical PE, not ‘an accident’ or ‘an underlying medical condition’.

“He begged to have amputation of the penis performed, as the size and weight of the organ had become so great that it was impossible for him to carry on his business.”
“The length of the organ from the pubis to the end of the prepuce was ten and one-half inches; the circumference at the middle of the body was nine and three-quarters inches.”

It must be an underlying medical condition. He experienced a large size increase before using this apparatus. The size change was so extreme that it cannot be considered similar to NPE.

Originally Posted by london100
…..
It must be an underlying medical condition. He experienced a large size increase before using this apparatus. The size change was so extreme that it cannot be considered similar to NPE.


Where are you reading that?

Originally Posted by london100
…..
The size change was so extreme that it cannot be considered similar to NPE.


This is a dogma or what?

The size increase came before the construction of this harness:

“Shortly after his marriage he observed that when he donned
his tights, in which he appeared during his exhibitions, that his
appearance was quite unseemly. In order to rectify this condition,
he devised a harness so adjusted that he could strap the
penis to the scrotum between his testicles.”

You might be right actually. Maybe it could be considered similar to NPE:

“the disease would seem, in some manner, to be associated with injuries to the lymphatic vessels.”

People with lymphatic abnormailities apparently can end up with 12 inch long penises. People with normal lymphatic systems might experience modest growth due to the build-up of lymph fluid between the tunica and fascia (like in the strangulation studies you posted)

Originally Posted by london100
The size increase came before the construction of this harness:
….


Originally Posted by marinera
“After using the apparatus for the space of two years he observed that the organ was increasing greatly in size.”
….

:confused:

Yes but his penis became abnormally large before this:

“Shortly after his marriage he observed that when he donned
his tights, in which he appeared during his exhibitions, that his
appearance was quite unseemly.

That doesn’t means that his penis was abnormally large, London. :rolleyes:

Originally Posted by marinera

That doesn’t means that his penis was abnormally large, London. :rolleyes:

I understood the unseemly comment to mean his unit was above average.

May be. I think it is more a witnessing of the pruderie of that times (1898), though; perhaps this helps?

“At the age of twenty-five the organ was of normal size. He is married and his wife has borne him two children.”

Seems pretty clear that the ‘culprit’ of the gigantic enlargment is the use of the harness, as I uderstand it. Very likely he had a predisposition for abnormal growth. That’s not the same that saying that he had an illness that caused the enlargment.

In the end the document could even be a fake, who knows? You can’t trust anything on the Internet. Seems authentic to me though. Have you seen the attached pics?

You could argue either way. He may have been abnormally self-conscious. He may have experienced abnormal growth.

It is an interesting study.

“The origin of hypertrophy of the penis is not yet understood; from cases that have been reported to the medical profession, the disease would seem, in some manner, to be associated with injuries to the lymphatic vessels.”

It suggests that repetitious trauma could potentially generate a build-up of lymph fluid and this could result in hypertrophy (or the appearance of hypertrophy). That’s at least what the authors of the study seem to think.

This might imply that the length and girth gains that everyone experiences on this site could be the result of repetitious trauma.

There could be a compound in the fluid itself that leads to growth.

According to wikipedia:
“As a growth medium: In 1907 the zoologist Ross Granville Harrison demonstrated the growth of frog nerve cell processes in a medium of clotted lymph.”

There is an article about priapism, which states that megalophallus is due to lymph build-up. (This idea contradicts several other studies)

(I’m not aligning myself with this theory. Just throwing it out there.)

The document is certainly not fake. Its on pubmed and too well written to be fake.

Too bad the hung acrobat has not donate his penis to the science, some exams on it would had been interesting.

If you google Rasputins pemis, you can see a picture of the legendary lovers alleged preserved 12 inch penis. Probably not hypotrophiic, but apparently an unauthorized donated penis for “science.”

Top
Thread Closed

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:41 AM.