Hard Flaccid Faith Based Claims
I’ve said before that I don’t and never for even one second have had hard flaccid. I have erectile dysfunction and a loss of sexual sensation, which in the beginning I was absolutely crushed and terrified over. Despite how awful my mental state was in the beginning concerning my penis, I never had hard flaccid. Also, there are so many guys who read the injury forums and get scared reading about hard flaccid, and worry that they might get it, but never get it. For the ones who do it happens after milking their penis, stretching their penis, masturbating too hard, etc.
A few people say that many people just get it randomly, but where are the thousands of posts about people just getting it randomly? A few people say that they have talked to many who have recovered, but where are the thousands of posts of all of these people? So what is more credible- what a few people keep saying over and over, (and have been saying for like 6 years), or thousands of posts, by thousands of people all over the world?
There are a few punch lines, debate tactics, fluff- whatever you want to call it, stuff with no substance, that these people try to use to basically bully others into not questioning them or asking questions, so we need to identify what they are doing so people don’t have to feel pressured by it.
If you think about it, a lot of what they say is strikingly similar to the strategies that are used by various religious institutions, and what they really have is a religion, a cult, that ignores evidence. Fear and uncertainty are the perfect ingredients for people to turn to blind faith. Look at the black plague in Europe. People ran through the streets whipping themselves to atone for their sins, hoping god would have mercy. They rounded up and burned groups of jewish people, hoping it would appease god. Naturally some people who survived thought that it was because they not only prayed enough but truly believed in god in their hearts, where those died may have prayed, but didn’t truly believe strongly enough in their hearts.
With this cancerous hard flaccid coping religion that we’ve been stuck with for like six years, it’s the same. The ones who recovered relaxed deeply enough in their subconscious, and those didn’t recover, but may have appeared to have moved on with their lives, didn’t relax deeply enough in their subconscious. And if it’s so impossible to fully relax deeply in their subconscious, how does anyone actually ever really do it? Some of the people who did recover after a short time weren’t even that relaxed- they were trying to be positive but clearly they still had concerns about hard flaccid, so how did they recover?
Now we get into the ridiculous counter arguments. First, because I’m mocking how obviously silly it is, it proves that I’m not open minded. If someone told you go join ISIS, would you be open minded? If a used car salesman was BSing you, would you be open minded? Being open minded is great, but be open minded about evidence, about critical thinking, about logic. You don’t have to be open minded to every snake oil salesman that comes knocking or every person in an airport handing out a pamphlet about some religion.
Next is that if you get angry or show emotion, it proves that you are emotional, you are aren’t rational. Guys this is dumb as all hell. If an ISIS member was trying to brainwash vulnerable people into leaving their country and joining ISIS, would you get emotional or angry? If a sleazy lawyer was trying to scam a friend or loved one, would you get emotional or angry? When someone calls you and bothers you trying to sell you something, do you ever get angry? Do you know who doesn’t show genuine human emotion? The con men- because they are acting, they are scheming, they are trying to appear calm and rational. The oldest trick in the book is to try to paint opponents as unhinged and crazy- don’t fall for it.
Then there’s the argument that they used to be just like us. So what? People convert from one religion to another all of the time, one political party to another all of the time, change beliefs about all kinds of things all of the time. Just saying that they used to be like us, then they changed their minds isn’t actually evidence.
Then there’s the argument that because I spent the time putting together facts, evidence and logic to make this post, it proves that I’m argumentative and I’m not listening. Again, really silly. This post consists of facts, evidence and logic. If taking the time to actually use your head and think about facts means that you are somehow wrong, then it shows you how lost and confused these people are. And there’s nothing wrong ‘arguing’ especially when there are differences of opinion. That’s what democracy is about, constructive debate, sharing evidence, challenging each other, ‘arguing.’ Would you rather that or just listen to an authority figure without question?
Last is that people will sometimes judge a post based on how they feel about the poster’s personality. Whether you like me or not, I hope you’ll focus on the evidence that I’ve laid out in this post. And I hope that we continue ‘arguing’ AKA thinking, challenging each other, considering facts and evidence, until we cut through all of the intimidation, silencing tactics, house of card arguments that are designed to make people scared and ashamed to question stuff that should have been laughed off the forums a long time ago.
So I invite anyone, let’s debate facts and evidence until we all are forced to the end game- truth.