2013-14 Penis Size Study, Journal of Sexual Medicine

Self reported studys are not reliable.

They are time and time again quiet chaotic, in deviation from professional measurements, who seem rather consistent in their distribution.

Measurement tools might help a bit in this study. I consider the Thundersplace study of girth and length more accurate as most on here know, and have interest, how to measure correctly.

For me, the girth should be measured at the thickest point. But I think measuring on the other point is important too because, as You said, not every penis has the same girth along the shaft. If You measure two penises, with the same length :
A) 6” base girth, 5.9” mid-shaft, 5.7” head.
B)6.2” base girth, 5.5” mid-shaft, 5.25” head.
But it’s reported only the thickest point, You can learn B) has 6.2” but it’s not a “real” 6.2” EG, because it becomes thinner along the shaft.

In general I agree about self-reported studies. However these guys were measuring in order to receive a custom fit condom.

“The men were asked to self-report on their penile dimensions, but were informed that they would be provided with custom fit condoms in exchange for this information. Thus, the men had a strong incentive and motivation to report their size accurately, otherwise they would run the risk of receiving condoms that were too big or too small and, therefore, of no use.”

So if they lie about their size, they get condoms that are useless. So not much incentive to lie, lots of incentive to report accurately. Data lines up pretty well with clinical studies too.

I have my doubts about the Thundersplace study of girth and length as I think there may be a TON of self-selection bias going on here. Just my humble opinion though, haven’t looked at the data in a while.

Pretty sure a vagina will report it as real! As I understand it, most nerve endings near entrance of vagina.

But that;s probably a whole other thread, ha ha.

Here. It. Goes. Again! :D I’m ready to read and listen to the great minds here at TP about penile size. But it seems that every study the average is 14-17cm. So I’m curious to know the reason behind finding the average size. I bet if science put more research into PE they might find that you can make you penis larger.

Interesting study and I’m more likely to believe the results than the Kinsey study. The measurement tool is probably the same as the custom condoms sold by Condomania or TheyFit. I’ve tried that paper tool before and the measurement is based on letters but a conversion table was somewhere - can’t recall where I found it. I think the conversion from the bottom side to NBPEL is pretty close.

As for girth, I debate myself on that all the time. My mid-shaft is 5.25” but the base and head (ridge) are closer to 6”. I consider myself 5.25” though and that is what I would report on a study. So maybe I would be contributing to incorrect numbers.

I mean, it’s not a 6.2” girthy volume penis. Vagina reports everything LOL.

I wonder if the nerve endings in the vagina are kind of the same as in the colon. Because you know, you can barely feel pain in the colon during a BM. So to dumb it down, does the vagina become less sensitive the deeper you go? If that was the case then having a larger member wouldn’t make any difference if the most sensitive ending are toward the outside.

And a little fun fact, the G Spot was almost called the “WhippleTickle” and should be changed to that. :D

There are some different spots including the deep spots.

I hit a spot with my wife sometimes and she goes off like a rocket.

It’s only when she’s on top and grinding and me 110% hard.

Grind that Whipple tickle a-unit! Ha.

My penis is exactly as long as my 15lbs house cat (if measured the same way).

Thatsa big dick iamaru.

Whatever you want to call it!